CNN/Money 
CNNMoney.com
graphic
News > Technology
graphic
Will an anti-spam list work?
A do-not-spam registry might not block all offenders, but it still is worth attempting, some say.
October 23, 2003: 3:25 PM EDT
By Joseph Lee, CNN/Money Staff Writer

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - If a list can help to block telemarketers, something similar should work for e-mail spammers, right?

Maybe, say anti-spam experts, who admit they have their doubts.

With more than 50 million phone numbers registered on the national do-not-call list aimed at telemarketers, the Senate unanimously passed a bill Wednesday that would create a similar measure to block unsolicited commercial e-mails.

The vote marked the first time the Senate has taken action against spam, which now accounts for about half of all e-mail traffic.

The Direct Marketing Association, the biggest group representing marketers, said it supported the effort in the Senate to create a national standard that distinguishes commercial e-mail from unlawful spam. But the group expressed concern about the provision that could lead to the creation of a national do-not-e-mail registry.

Furthermore, said DMA spokesman Louis Mastria, a do-not-e-mail list probably wouldn't work. "A do-not-spam list sounds attractive, but it won't work the same as do-not-call," Mastria said.

Spammers often send out e-mails containing pornographic and get-rich-quick schemes from their home computers or some off-shore terminals. "Tracking them down won't be easy," Mastria said.

"If they are breaking the law already, a new measurement will not prohibit them from sending those e-mails," Mastria added. "But it will be horribly painful to legitimate e-mail marketers."

YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS
Antispam Registry
Spam

Matthew Prince, co-founder of Unspam, a Chicago-based consulting firm, said that while the bill might be a compromise, it's a good start.

"Parents we spoke to said children receiving inappropriate spam is a serious concern," he said. "Spammers should face enhanced penalties for sending inappropriate messages to children," and a do-not-spam list is "long overdue," he added.

Some experts expressed concern that the new bill isn't as strict as some of the state laws already in effect.

"We are a bit worried that this bill will pre-empt some tough anti-spam laws in states like California, Washington and Virginia," said John Mozena, co-founder of the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail.

Lawmakers in the Senate noted spam has become a priority among voters and could overwhelm the Internet if left unchecked.

Similar legislation in the House has stalled as lawmakers try to hammer out differences between two competing bills. The Bush administration has expressed support for the measure.  Top of page




  More on TECHNOLOGY
Google limits free news access
Zynga suddenly is everywhere
Best Buy wants your electronic junk
  TODAY'S TOP STORIES
Best time of year to land a job
Stocks rally on jobs report
6 banks fail, tally reaches 130




graphic graphic

© 2009 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 BigCharts.com Inc. All rights reserved. Please see our Terms of Use.
MarketWatch, the MarketWatch logo, and BigCharts are registered trademarks of MarketWatch, Inc.
Intraday data provided by Interactive Data Real-Time Services and subject to the Terms of Use.
Intraday data is at least 20-minutes delayed. All times are ET.
Historical, current end-of-day data, and splits data provided by Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data.
Fundamental data provided by Morningstar, Inc..
SEC Filings data provided by Edgar Online Inc..
Earnings data provided by FactSet CallStreet, LLC.