CNN/Money One for credit card only hard offer form at $9.95 One for risk-free form at $14.95 w/ $9.95 upsell  

Our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy have changed.

By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to the new Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

News > Fortune 500
Merck's Vioxx e-mail scrutinized
Report: Letters show company executives long aware of links between pain drug and heart risks.
November 1, 2004: 6:55 AM EST

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Internal Merck & Co. e-mails and marketing materials show the drugmaker fought forcefully for years to keep safety concerns from destroying the sales of big-selling painkiller Vioxx, according to a published report.

Merck & Company Incorporated
Consumer Safety

The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that the e-mails seen by the paper show that Merck executives were worried in the mid-to-late 1990's that Vioxx would show greater heart risk than cheaper painkillers that were harsh on the stomach but were believed to reduce the risk of heart attacks. The company pulled Vioxx off the market in September, citing increased cardiac risk.

The paper said that several company officials discussed in e-mails how to design a study that would minimize the finding that Vioxx had a higher heart attack risk than the cheaper drugs, even though some of those writing the e-mails believed that damaging comparisons would be difficult to conceal.

The paper reported that, in a March 9, 2000 e-mail, Merck research chief Edward Scolnick stated the cardiovascular events "are clearly there" and called it a "shame." The paper said he compared Vioxx to other drugs with known side effects and wrote, "there is always a hazard."

Merck continued to deny any link between heart attacks and Vioxx up until the announcement that the drug was being pulled from the market.

Merck faces lawsuits by those who suffered heart attacks after taking the drug, as well as from family members. The e-mails and documents reviewed by the Journal could hurt the company in those suits.

A lawyer representing Merck told the Journal the internal e-mails and marketing materials were "taken out of context" and "do not accurately represent the conduct of Merck and its employees." But the paper said the company did not provide additional material to place the damaging e-mails in context, citing the pending litigation.

Shares of Merck (Research), a component of the Dow Jones industrial average, lost more than 1 percent in trading in Frankfurt following the early-morning report.  Top of page

  More on NEWS
The Pacific trade deal Trump quit is back on
Netflix joins the exclusive $100 billion club
Lamborghini: Not stopping with an SUV
The Pacific trade deal Trump quit is back on
The NAFTA talks just got even harder
Top Twitter executive departs

graphic graphic