$4 gas solution: More miles per gallon

House committee explores raising fuel economy standards for American automobiles in response to record gas prices.

EMAIL  |   PRINT  |   SHARE  |   RSS
 
google my aol my msn my yahoo! netvibes
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all CNNMoney.com RSS FEEDS (close)
By David Goldman, CNNMoney.com staff writer

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Oil speculation has been getting a lot of attention from Congress lately. On Thursday lawmakers took up another possible solution: getting more miles per gallon out of cars Americans drive.

Last December, Congress passed the Energy Information and Security Act (EISA), which mandated that the car standards and light truck standards be set high enough to ensure that the combined industry-wide average reaches at least 35 mpg in model year 2020.

But since then, the issue has taken on even greater urgency. Gas prices were less than $3 a gallon when President Bush signed the bill into law, but they average more than $4 today, according to AAA.

At a Thursday hearing held by Congress' Select Committee on Energy Independence, lawmakers said the nation's fuel economy efforts need to go further.

"It's our job to set the standards not the producers," said Rep. Jay Inslee, D-Wash. "We've been following them for years, and now we're lagging far behind the rest of the world."

Others agreed, citing Bush Administration studies that found the 35 mpg fuel economy standard could be introduced even sooner.

"[The Department of Transportation] said the technology is available to achieve a fleet wide fuel economy of 35 miles per gallon by 2015," said Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., the committee chair.

But the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) - a unit within the U.S. Department of Transportation - is reluctant to force the auto industry to set that standard before 2020. That's because the DOT argued that gas prices may come down significantly in the future. The data they use, supplied to them by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, assumes gas prices will cost $2.51 per gallon in 2030.

Markey called the EIA numbers outdated.

"The Energy Information Administration assumptions simply defy reality," said Markey. "These numbers are nothing short of absurd."

But the Transportation Department said the current standards go far enough.

"These standards are tough, but achievable and necessary," said Tyler Duvall, the Department of Transportation's Assistant Secretary for Policy, in testimony before the committee. "All told, the proposal will save nearly 55 billion gallons of fuel and a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions estimated at 521 million metric tons over the life of the affected vehicles."

Too much pressure on the U.S. auto industry

Some suggested increased fuel standards would devastate an already battered U.S. auto industry.

"Many in this Congress are focused on bankrupting the domestic auto industry," said Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich. "This is an $85 billion mandate on domestic autos ... that puts the breaks on innovation."

Miller said Congress should provide the auto industry with incentives to produce more fuel-efficient vehicles rather than mandating expenditures on "an old and antiquated technology."

Duvall, the Transportation Department official, was asked by Markey whether the government should prepare for the worst and set fuel standards as if gas will continue to rise at an extraordinary pace. Duvall said no, arguing that the auto industry would lose too many jobs, as SUV and truck plants close down.

The answer prompted a heated exchange. Markey vehemently disagreed with Duvall and said the future of the auto industry lies in technological innovation.

"We've already lost a million jobs or more because of wrong estimates [about gas prices]," said Markey. "The only way to get new jobs is to get new technology."

"America's strength lies not in its oil reserves but its superior technological might," he added. "We will need to use vehicles that use no oil at all."

The committee was established by Speaker Nancy Pelosi last year to address the challenges of the nation's oil dependence and the threat of global warming.  To top of page

Features
They're hiring!These Fortune 100 employers have at least 350 openings each. What are they looking for in a new hire? More
If the Fortune 500 were a country...It would be the world's second-biggest economy. See how big companies' sales stack up against GDP over the past decade. More
Sponsored By:
5 ways retailers are tracking you If you think pesky salespeople are invading your personal space, check out these 5 technologies that are tracking your movements throughout a store. More
Moto X vs. Droid Turbo: Which Droid should you buy? Motorola has made the two best Android smartphones this year. Here's how they stack up. More
My part-time job is a dead end, but it's all I can find CNNMoney profiles 4 of America's 7 million part-time workers unable to find full-time jobs. More


Most stock quote data provided by BATS. Market indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer.

Morningstar: © 2014 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Factset: FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2014. All rights reserved.

Chicago Mercantile Association: Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Dow Jones: The Dow Jones branded indices are proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by DJI Opco, a subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and have been licensed for use to S&P Opco, LLC and CNN. Standard & Poor's and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. All content of the Dow Jones branded indices © S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2014 and/or its affiliates.