Fannie and Freddie 101

Here's how the two mortgage giants became wards of the federal government.

EMAIL  |   PRINT  |   SHARE  |   RSS
 
google my aol my msn my yahoo! netvibes
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all CNNMoney.com RSS FEEDS (close)
By Ali Velshi, CNN senior business correspondent

Do you think the government takeover of mortgage buyers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was a good move?
  • Yes. It just might save the housing market
  • No. Itís too risky to taxpayers
  • Itís too soon to say

NEW YORK (CNN) -- Call it a bailout, or a rescue, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are now firmly under the grip of the U.S. government.

The widely anticipated move was the logical next step as the housing crisis continued to erode the two mortgage giants.

"We have determined that it is necessary to take action," Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Sunday. "Our markets will not recover until the end of this housing crisis. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are critical to turning the corner on housing." (Paulson's statement)

And with that, the U.S. government took control of sister companies Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500), two massive public companies at the heart of the nation's mortgage system. Together, Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee more than half of the U.S. mortgage market - that's more than $5 trillion in loans.

Here's how they work: Banks loan money to home buyers. The banks then sell those mortgages - assuming they meet certain credit standards - to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

Banks then use the money they get from the sale of those mortgages to make new loans. Fannie and Freddie, meanwhile, bundle those loans, attach a payment guarantee to them, and resell them as bonds.

"They might issue the mortgage on Monday and sell it in the secondary market to Fannie and Freddie on Tuesday, and then Fannie and Freddie is putting it together in a mortgage backed security, selling it a week, two weeks later," said Dean Baker, an economist who is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington. "So they're incredibly important institutions."

The system provided a continuous supply of relatively low-interest cash, allowing banks to keep making affordable loans to home buyers.

But as home prices dropped, mortgage defaults soared, making it harder for Fannie and Freddie to raise money.

"The interest rate that Fannie and Freddie had to pay began to rise and of course that gets passed on in higher mortage rates to anyone who goes to buy a home," said Baker.

So, in an emergency move in July, Paulson said the government stood ready to provide direct financial support to Fannie and Freddie, if needed. He said he hoped it wouldn't be needed.

"If you've got a squirt gun in your pocket, you may have to take it out," Paulson told the Senate Banking Committee on July 15. "If you've got a bazooka, and people know you've got it, you may not have to take it out."

But without an "explicit" guarantee from the U.S. government, the stock of both companies continued to drop, and major investors - including the central banks of Russia and China - started selling Fannie and Freddie bonds fast. That made it harder, and more expensive, for Fannie and Freddie to raise money.

That guarantee that investors wanted is now explicit. The U.S. government is now in the business of buying and reselling mortgages, and Paulson and his cohorts hope that sends the message that Fannie and Freddie are safe.

Under the best-case scenario, the cost of a 30-year mortgage could start to drop - maybe as much as a third of a percentage point, and that could encourage more home sales.

The bad news - taxpayers could get stuck with a $200 billion bill for the bailout. To top of page

Features
They're hiring!These Fortune 100 employers have at least 350 openings each. What are they looking for in a new hire? More
If the Fortune 500 were a country...It would be the world's second-biggest economy. See how big companies' sales stack up against GDP over the past decade. More
Sponsored By:
More Galleries
Most 'one percent' moments of 2014 This year was all about more money, more problems. Here's a look at the trials, tribulations and triumphs of the 1% over the last year. More
6 products to keep the skies friendly Plane travel can be stressful, especially during the holidays. These things can help keep the peace among travelers. More
2014: Helluva good year for stocks The bull market has been going for 2,115 days. If you put you're money in stocks, it's been a very happy year. More

Most stock quote data provided by BATS. Market indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer.

Morningstar: © 2014 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Factset: FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2014. All rights reserved.

Chicago Mercantile Association: Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Dow Jones: The Dow Jones branded indices are proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by DJI Opco, a subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and have been licensed for use to S&P Opco, LLC and CNN. Standard & Poor's and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor‚Äôs Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. All content of the Dow Jones branded indices © S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2014 and/or its affiliates.