Buybacks take a beating
The stock-pumping tactic may have lost its mojo.
 |
| Market mover or misstep? Microsoft recently tried to send Wall Street a message. |
(Fortune Magazine) -- Last month, Microsoft announced it was going to spend $40 billion buying back its own stock. Traditionally, that would have meant a payday for its investors. With Microsoft using its own spare cash to reduce the number of outstanding shares, earnings per share should have improved, and the stock price should have ticked upwards.
But a funny thing has happened since the announcement: Microsoft's stock got a slight bump, then quickly tumbled.
Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500) is not alone. Nike (NKE, Fortune 500) and Hewlett-Packard (HPQ, Fortune 500) have also recently announced buybacks that fizzled (but what hasn't in this market?). This has prompted shareholders and CFOs to wonder whether buybacks are another false god of the bull market or merely collateral damage of the credit crisis.
"Buybacks were almost as good as firing 1,000 people," says Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at Standard & Poor's.
Between 2003 and 2007, the amount of cash S&P 500 companies spent on buybacks nearly quadrupled, from $135 billion to $590 billion. The higher the market rose, the more shares companies bought. The peak of this "buyback bubble" occurred in the third quarter of 2007, when the Dow was at 14,000.
During that time financial services companies including Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) were buying up their own stock like crazy when their spare cash might have been better spent deleveraging their balance sheets. "It was bizarre how companies were repurchasing at such high levels," observes John Graham, a finance professor at Duke University who surveys CFOs on their repurchasing plans.
Take the case of Merrill Lynch (MER, Fortune 500). In February 2006, Mother Merrill, flush with cash, announced plans to buy back $6 billion in stock, more than doubling its previously announced repurchase plan.
At the time, Merrill's stock price got a nice boost, rising almost 2% that day - and more than 20% for the rest of the year, to $89. If you sold then, the buyback treated you right. But any long-term shareholder got trounced: Since then, Merrill has lost 80% of its value and agreed to be taken over by Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500).
So how should investors view buybacks in today's tempestuous market? The irony is that this might be the time to have any real faith in them. Right now only companies in decent shape - generating real, secure cash flow and not dependent on the debt or capital markets - can afford to buy back stock, and this is a chance to get the stock cheap.
"Look at Microsoft. The Yahoo deal didn't work out. Now it's got all this cash, and it's looking for a place to put it. So this is like Microsoft saying it thinks that it is the best investment out there," says Art Hogan, chief market analyst with Jefferies & Co. "The message you are sending out is you think your stock is a bargain." 
-
Most books on Apple's CEO come in one of three genres: Hero, Creep or Creepy Genius. More -
Stars from Rachael Ray to Neil Patrick Harris reveal the apps they love to use. More -
Executives from Andy Grove to Bob Iger explain what makes Jobs one of the best business minds of our time. More -
Which young executives at public companies raked it in - and how much did they earn? More -
The folks on Fortune's 40 under 40 list may be rising stars, but they're not perfect. Here are the decisions they most regret in their careers. More -
Who cares if lower pay lures some of the finest away? It's not as if they were doing a good job to begin with. More
