Auto bailout ABCs

Here's how the bill passed by the House breaks down for the survival of the Big Three automakers.

EMAIL  |   PRINT  |   SHARE  |   RSS
 
google my aol my msn my yahoo! netvibes
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all CNNMoney.com RSS FEEDS (close)
Peter Valdes-Dapena, CNNMoney.com senior writer

us_capitol_lowangle.ce.03.jpg
A Congressional plan to save the U.S. auto industry has cleared one hurdle, but faces many more.

Find your next Car



NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- With a bailout bill floating through Congress, America's automakers are hoping for a lifeline from Uncle Sam that could help them hold on until the summer.

The bill has made it through the House of Representatives, but it faces a tough fight in the Senate. It's not a complete answer to their problems, and it comes with some big strings attached, but it is the only viable plan on the table.

Here are the basics of the bill so far.

The money

The House bill provides for $14 billion in government loans. The government would prioritize the loans based on need, ability to productively use the money and the potential economic impact of each automaker's failure.

Loan interest would be 5% for the first five years. After that, it would go up to 9%, and all the money would have to be paid back within 7 years. Carmakers wouldn't be penalized for paying back early.

If the carmakers aren't making sufficient progress in their restructuring plans, or aren't meeting set deadlines, the government could demand immediate repayment.

The Czar

The President would select a designee to oversee the loans and the automakers' restructuring. Qualifications for the "car czar" job would include expertise in company turnarounds and environmental protection.

The czar would authorize the loans or lines of credit and assess each automaker's restructuring plan and its progress in meeting that plan.

By New Year's Day, 2009, the Czar would have to come up with a method for assessing each automaker's progress toward filing its own restructuring plan. 45 days later, he'd have to provide a report that measures each automaker's progress.

The czar would have the power to examine any records or interview any executive or employee to assess each automaker's progress toward creating and carrying out their plans.

Carmakers would have to report any significant activities to the czar during the term of the loan, such as a proposed asset sale, transaction or contract with a value greater than $100 million. That would include a sale of the companies.

The czar would have the power to prohibit any business move he thought would harm the company's long-term viability.

If the car czar felt he didn't have enough power to get the job done, he could request additional powers - or even new legislation - from Congress. The czar would report to the Comptroller General of the United States, who is in charge of the U.S. General Accountability Office.

The plan

An automaker's restructuring plan would have to lay out just how it would return to viability and repay the government's money.

Among other things, the automakers would need to show that they have a reasonable expectation of making money, that they can make more fuel-efficient cars, and that they're competitive in the U.S. market.

Since the plan could mean significant money sacrifices for anyone who does business with the automaker, the czar would facilitate meetings between the automakers and employee and retiree representatives, union representatives, suppliers, dealers and shareholders.

Detailed restructuring plans would have to be submitted to the czar by March 31. That deadline could be extended for 30 days if the czar believes the parties are negotiating in good faith and trying to reach a deal.

If the deadlines aren't met, the czar could demand that any money already doled out would be immediately returned and the carmaker could be shut off any further loans.

Executive pay

The chief executives of the Big Three have already agreed to work for a salary of $1 a year. While the bill doesn't stipulate specific salaries, it says that automakers would have to standards for compensation and governance.

Executives would get no bonuses, there would be no "golden parachutes" for departing executives, and the companies would not pay dividends to shareholders for the period of the loans.

There would also be limits on any compensation that encouraged senior manages to engage in risky business practices.

Return on investment

For manufacturers with publicly traded stocks, the government would get warrants enabling it to buy non-voting shares worth 20 percent of the amount of the loan.

For Chrysler, which is privately owned by Cerberus Capital Management, the government would receive warrants to buy equity in either Chrysler or in Cerberus itself.

Airplanes

After the fracas that erupted when the Big Three CEOs rode in private planes to their first hearing on Capitol Hill in November, corporate jets would be out - at least as long as government loans were outstanding. Automakers would not be allowed to own, lease or even share in any private aircraft.

Buses and trains

Automakers would also be required to seriously study the possibility of using idle factories to produce vehicles for sale to mass transit agencies. They'd have to look at the potential market for buses and trains and their parts and submit a report to the GAO, which would provide reports to Congress and czar.

Senate: Changes needed

In its current form, it's far from certain this bill will be passed by the Senate. Some Republicans say it's simply not strong enough to ensure success.

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., threw out three legislative changes he said would allow the automakers to make the changes they need to be competitive.

He proposed that GM and Chrysler must reduce their debt by two-thirds by March 15 or file for bankruptcy.

He also said the UAW would have to accept significant equity in the companies to help offset future retiree health care payments, instead of cash or other assets the companies were to contribute to union-controlled trust funds

Finally, he said the union would have to accept pay cuts for GM and Chrysler workers to levels paid at the U.S. plants of overseas automakers. To top of page

Features
They're hiring!These Fortune 100 employers have at least 350 openings each. What are they looking for in a new hire? More
If the Fortune 500 were a country...It would be the world's second-biggest economy. See how big companies' sales stack up against GDP over the past decade. More
Sponsored By:
More Galleries
Most 'one percent' moments of 2014 This year was all about more money, more problems. Here's a look at the trials, tribulations and triumphs of the 1% over the last year. More
6 products to keep the skies friendly Plane travel can be stressful, especially during the holidays. These things can help keep the peace among travelers. More
2014: Helluva good year for stocks The bull market has been going for 2,115 days. If you put you're money in stocks, it's been a very happy year. More

Most stock quote data provided by BATS. Market indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer.

Morningstar: © 2014 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Factset: FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2014. All rights reserved.

Chicago Mercantile Association: Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Dow Jones: The Dow Jones branded indices are proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by DJI Opco, a subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and have been licensed for use to S&P Opco, LLC and CNN. Standard & Poor's and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. All content of the Dow Jones branded indices © S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2014 and/or its affiliates.