Breaking Views

How Geithner's vulture funds may work

The treasury secretary can square the circle for cleaning up bank balance sheets. But he has to be pretty generous.

By Hugo Dixon, breakingviews.com
February 12, 2009: 12:01 PM ET

(breakingviews.com) -- Tim Geithner may go down in history as the man who does most to spur vulture investing - provided he manages to get his public/private investment fund airborne.

But for his scheme for cleaning up bank balance sheets to work, the U.S. Treasury secretary will have to induce banks to sell toxic assets and private investors to put up capital to buy them.

Geithner hasn't said how he will achieve such a feat. But one solution would be to provide the vultures with lashings of cheap non-recourse loans. They wouldn't have to repay the non-recourse loans if the investments bombed, effectively giving them downside protection. With some heroic assumptions, it is even possible to work out how big and cheap these loans will have to be.

The first thought is that banks will need to be offered a premium to market prices to part with their assets - after all, the value of the assets on their books may already be well above a true market price.

We've chosen a 20% premium. Equally, vultures will need to see a way to make a good profit to venture in where angels fear to tread. We've assumed they will need a 25% internal rate of return.

The next assumption concerns what these toxic investments will ultimately be worth. If investors think they will end up worth less than they have to pay, there is no point becoming a vulture.

But if they believe asset prices have partly been depressed by lack of liquidity - and that some of the value will return - they might want to take the plunge. We've assumed that the ultimate value will be 40% above current market levels.

There are then two further assumptions. One is how long investors hold the assets. We've plugged in five years. The second is the cash flows from the assets in the meantime, which can be used to service the non-recourse debt and even to generate a profit.

We've assumed the assets generate annual cash flow equivalent to 8% of their current market values. In order to simplify the math, we've also assumed excess annual cash flow is held in the vulture fund and earns an annual return of 10% until the fund is finally liquidated.

Putting all these assumptions together, it turns out that Geithner can square the circle. But he has to be pretty generous. He has to provide the vultures with 85% of their total funding requirement in the form of non-recourse debt; and he has to charge them a mere 5% interest.

It would be interesting to hear what Congress thinks of that. To top of page


Company Price Change % Change
Intel Corp 32.00 1.92 6.38%
Bank of America Corp... 15.31 -0.11 -0.71%
Ford Motor Co 15.98 -0.03 -0.19%
Apple Inc 123.25 -0.99 -0.80%
Microsoft Corp 40.97 -0.24 -0.58%
Data as of Mar 27
Index Last Change % Change
Dow 17,712.66 34.43 0.19%
Nasdaq 4,891.22 27.86 0.57%
S&P 500 2,061.02 4.87 0.24%
Treasuries 1.95 -0.06 -2.94%
Data as of 8:31am ET
More Galleries
Tech's highest paid women Silicon Valley isn't known for its diversity, but it is home to a handful of highly paid female executives. More
9 reasons to be hopeful about women in tech These startups are working to leverage technology to level the playing field for minorities and women in tech. More
10 best states to retire in Forget Florida. Residents of these states are happy, safe, and have good health care -- all for the right price. More
Sponsors