Are REITs worth it?

Real estate investment trusts can be a good way to diversify your portfolio, despite their recent lackluster performance.

EMAIL  |   PRINT  |   SHARE  |   RSS
 
google my aol my msn my yahoo! netvibes
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all CNNMoney.com RSS FEEDS (close)
By George Mannes, Money Magazine senior writer

george_mannes.03.jpg
Send us your investing questions to: answer_guy@moneymail.com

(Money Magazine) -- Question: I've been told real estate investment trusts offer great diversification. But do they really? Last year REITs lost 38% - that's a bit worse than the S&P 500. --Brian M., Greenwich, Conn.

Answer: Historically, devoting part of your portfolio to real estate investments trusts - shares of firms that own or manage properties - has indeed raised your returns and reduced your investment risk. You don't have to search too far to find a time when holding REITs boosted your returns: From 2000 through 2002, when the S&P was down 38%, REIT indexes returned 49%. And since 1972, investing just 10% of your stock holdings in REITS would have smoothed out your portfolio's overall ride.

Sadly, what's true over the long term isn't always true over the short. Being diversified won't guarantee against short-term losses, especially during a global financial crisis, explains investment adviser Richard Ferri. "Twenty percent of the time it isn't going to help you to have REITs," he says. "We just happen to be in that 20% right now."

To prepare your portfolio for the majority of time when the asset class does help, Ferri suggests putting 10% of your stocks into REIT funds. Two choices from the Money 70: Cohen & Steers Realty (CSRSX) and Vanguard REIT Index (VGSIX).

Question: Two years ago an adviser convinced me to open a Roth IRA. I'm putting in $416 a month, paying a 5.75% load every time. Should I keep paying the fee, since I don't know much about mutual funds? Or should I move the money? --Magnolia Olmedo, Los Angeles

Answer: You're off to a good start: You at least know enough about funds to suspect that you don't have to pay a 5.75% load to have a decent portfolio. Not that there's anything wrong with the two large-cap American Fund offerings your adviser put you into: EuroPacific Growth (AEPGX), an international fund that's on the Money 70, and Washington Mutual Investors (AWSHX), a U.S. portfolio. But for that kind of up-front cost, you should be getting ongoing advice - which you're apparently not, since you told us your only contacts with the adviser are occasional sales calls.

So what to do? June Schroeder, a certified financial planner in Elm Grove, Wis., advises you to leave your current Roth alone. It holds good funds, and it's not as if you'll get the load back by selling. But rather than add new money to that account, she suggests opening a new Roth at a no-load fund giant such as Fidelity, T. Rowe Price or Vanguard, where you can educate yourself about investing and build a portfolio of low-cost, diversified funds.

One idea for starting out: Split your money between Vanguard's LifeStrategy Moderate Growth (VSMGX) and STAR (VGSTX) - funds that expose you to a mix of stock and bonds. "It's like having your own investment adviser for almost nothing," says Schroeder.

Looking for some answers? Send us your questions about investing. E-mail answer_guy@moneymail.com. To top of page

Send feedback to Money Magazine
Features
They're hiring!These Fortune 100 employers have at least 350 openings each. What are they looking for in a new hire? More
If the Fortune 500 were a country...It would be the world's second-biggest economy. See how big companies' sales stack up against GDP over the past decade. More
Sponsored By:
More Galleries
50 years of the Ford Mustang Take a drive down memory lane with our favorite photos of the car through the years. More
Cool cars from the New York Auto Show These are some of the most interesting new models and concept vehicles from the Big Apple's car show. More
8 CEOs who took a pay cut in 2013 Median CEO pay inched up 9% in 2013 to $13.9 million. But not everyone got a bump last year. Here are eight CEOs who missed out. More
Worry about the hackers you don't know 
Crime syndicates and government organizations pose a much greater cyber threat than renegade hacker groups like Anonymous. Play
GE CEO: Bringing jobs back to the U.S. 
Jeff Immelt says the U.S. is a cost competitive market for advanced manufacturing and that GE is bringing jobs back from Mexico. Play
Hamster wheel and wedgie-powered transit 
Red Bull Creation challenges hackers and engineers to invent new modes of transportation. Play

Market indexes are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer LIBOR Warning: Neither BBA Enterprises Limited, nor the BBA LIBOR Contributor Banks, nor Reuters, can be held liable for any irregularity or inaccuracy of BBA LIBOR. Disclaimer. Morningstar: © 2014 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer The Dow Jones IndexesSM are proprietary to and distributed by Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and have been licensed for use. All content of the Dow Jones IndexesSM © 2014 is proprietary to Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Chicago Mercantile Association. The market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2014. All rights reserved. Most stock quote data provided by BATS.