BofA defends Merrill bonus settlement

Two weeks after a judge rejected an agreement with the SEC, Bank of America argues that the $33 million fine is appropriate.

EMAIL  |   PRINT  |   SHARE  |   RSS
 
google my aol my msn my yahoo! netvibes
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all CNNMoney.com RSS FEEDS (close)
By David Ellis, CNNMoney.com staff writer

Bailout tracker
Follow the money: Bailout tracker
The government is engaged in a far-reaching - and expensive - effort to rescue the economy. Here's how you can keep tabs on the bailouts. More

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Bank of America defended the fairness of a proposed $33 million settlement it struck with federal regulators over the Merrill Lynch bonus scandal, according to a federal court filing submitted Monday.

The Charlotte, N.C.-based bank, which has been under intense scrutiny for the $3.6 billion in bonus payments made to Merrill executives earlier this year, maintained that the penalty it struck with the Securities and Exchange Commission this month represented a "constructive conclusion" to the situation.

Regulators claimed that Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) had said in its proxy statement that it would not pay out bonuses to Merrill employees in fiscal year 2008, when, in fact, the bank authorized bonus payments of as much as $5.8 billion.

Of that allowance, $3.6 billion was paid out to more than 39,000 Merrill employees last year, averaging $91,000 per bonus. Merrill lost billions of dollars in 2008.

In Monday's filing, BofA suggested that investors should have already known about the bonuses given the media attention surrounding the merger after it was first announced last September. In addition, the bank pointed out that Merrill disclosed the size of its bonus pool when it reported financial results earlier that year.

While not admitting any guilt, Bank of America said it decided to settle with the SEC because it did not want to be distracted by a lengthy court battle with one of its main regulators at a time of market uncertainty.

"Had there been no settlement here, and were this case to be litigated to judgment, Bank of America would have powerful defenses to the SEC's claims," the company wrote.

Monday's revelation marks the latest twist in the long and tortuous dispute over bonuses paid to Merrill Lynch employees earlier this year.

Nearly two weeks ago, a federal judge rejected the proposed settlement. U.S. District Court Judge Jed Rakoff, who is overseeing the case, charged that the fine was not appropriate given the magnitude of the offense committed against Bank of America's shareholders.

Rakoff also expressed concern about the SEC's apparent unwillingness to single out any individual at either firm for signing off on the payments, and the possibility that the settlement would be paid using bailout money from U.S. taxpayers.

In a separate filing Monday, the SEC said that the $33 million fine "strikes the right balance between the goals of deterrence and the need to avoid unnecessary harm to existing shareholders."

The SEC added that it did not uncover anything else in its investigation to support charges against specific individuals at Bank of America or Merrill Lynch.

Rakoff is expected to rule on the matter by Sept. 9. To top of page

Features
They're hiring!These Fortune 100 employers have at least 350 openings each. What are they looking for in a new hire? More
If the Fortune 500 were a country...It would be the world's second-biggest economy. See how big companies' sales stack up against GDP over the past decade. More
Sponsored By:
More Galleries
10 things you'll love about Windows 10 There's a lot to like about Windows 10. Here are our favorite features in Microsoft's soon-to-be-released operating system. More
Warren Buffett's gone cold. How his top 10 stocks are doing The Oracle of Omaha is an investing legend. But several of Berkshire Hathaway's biggest investments are off to a lousy start in 2015. Will shareholders complain at the annual meeting in Omaha on Saturday? More
BMW's M235i doesn't compromise BMW's new M235i gives you the performance of an M car for a lot less money. More
Sponsors
Worry about the hackers you don't know 
Crime syndicates and government organizations pose a much greater cyber threat than renegade hacker groups like Anonymous. Play
GE CEO: Bringing jobs back to the U.S. 
Jeff Immelt says the U.S. is a cost competitive market for advanced manufacturing and that GE is bringing jobs back from Mexico. Play
Hamster wheel and wedgie-powered transit 
Red Bull Creation challenges hackers and engineers to invent new modes of transportation. Play