Chinese car market - both boon and headache

It's more than just tires. Despite exploding auto sales, manufacturers still face unruly business practices in mainland Asia's largest market.

EMAIL  |   PRINT  |   SHARE  |   RSS
 
google my aol my msn my yahoo! netvibes
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all CNNMoney.com RSS FEEDS (close)
By Alex Taylor III, senior editor

Safest hybrid cars
These five ultra-efficient vehicles have earned the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's Top Safety Pick Award.

Find your next Car


NEW YORK (Fortune) -- With Western markets still struggling to escape the effects of the recession, automakers are increasingly focusing their attention on China -- and rubbing their hands with glee. Car sales in August rose 78% over the same month a year ago, according to J.D. Power Asia Pacific and are running at an annual rate of 14 million units.

Compare that with the U.S. Back before the Cash for Clunkers program kicked in, the car market was chugging along at the rate of a mere nine million units.

But doing business in China still contains plenty of obstacles, as several recent events make clear. Beyond the trade dispute over tires, there are a host of challenges for Western manufacturers, ranging from difficulty in enforcing contracts to maintaining intellectual property rights.

First the good news. China has rebounded resoundingly from the global recession, the effects of the government tax incentives and subsidy policy notwithstanding. For the year, sales are up a robust 32%.

More growth is predicted.

J.D. Power forecasts that Chinese consumers will be buying more than 11.4 million vehicles annually by 2015. The reasoning is simple. The U.S. has about 820 vehicles for every 1,000 people. China today has roughly 34 vehicles per 1,000 people.

The Chinese car market is something of a free-for-all, with more than 90 local and foreign brands offering more than 400 different models. Western manufacturers dominate the list of bestsellers -- Volkswagen is number one -- but independent Chinese makers are moving up fast. Chery ranks seventh, BYD eighth, and Geely is 11th in overall sales.

Cashing in on this bonanza can tax the patience of even the most determined. Entrepreneur Malcolm Bricklin put out a news release to announce that his company had done something usually considered routine: It successfully served a lawsuit on Chery Automobile that it filed more than a year ago. Bricklin complained that Chery "repeatedly avoided service by refusing Federal Express packages containing the legal documents."

Even business people less mercurial than Bricklin find practices in China challenging. Take battery maker A123 Systems (AONE). In a prospectus for an initial public offering, it lays out the risks of operating in China, including "the potential inability to control our operations and relationships; enforce any agreements we have with Chinese partners, to find, retain or train suitable employees and to effectively protect our intellectual property rights."

The risk sections of IPO prospectuses frequently contain scary language, but the paragraphs on China invoke more fears than unusual.

They include:

• "Difficulty in enforcing agreements, judgments and arbitration awards in foreign legal systems" -- Malcolm Bricklin knows something about that;

• "Impediments to the flow of foreign exchange capital payments and receipts" -- some companies have been barred from withdrawing their profits from China and been forced to reinvest it in the country;

• "Additional regulation of rechargeable batteries, which may reduce our ability to sell in certain markets" -- it wouldn't be the first time the rules were changed in the middle of the game to protect the home team;

• "Longer payment cycles and potential difficulties in collecting accounts receivable" -- you mean you weren't planning to pay 30 days net?

It isn't exactly bedtime reading, but the A123 prospectus is more engaging than the typical legal boilerplate. Whether any of it materializes is another matter. But buried in one paragraph is the warning that "in the future may be opposition to normal trade relations status with China." If that part came true, who knows what's next? To top of page

Company Price Change % Change
Ford Motor Co 8.29 0.05 0.61%
Advanced Micro Devic... 54.59 0.70 1.30%
Cisco Systems Inc 47.49 -2.44 -4.89%
General Electric Co 13.00 -0.16 -1.22%
Kraft Heinz Co 27.84 -2.20 -7.32%
Data as of 2:44pm ET
Index Last Change % Change
Dow 32,627.97 -234.33 -0.71%
Nasdaq 13,215.24 99.07 0.76%
S&P 500 3,913.10 -2.36 -0.06%
Treasuries 1.73 0.00 0.12%
Data as of 6:29am ET
More Galleries
10 of the most luxurious airline amenity kits When it comes to in-flight pampering, the amenity kits offered by these 10 airlines are the ultimate in luxury More
7 startups that want to improve your mental health From a text therapy platform to apps that push you reminders to breathe, these self-care startups offer help on a daily basis or in times of need. More
5 radical technologies that will change how you get to work From Uber's flying cars to the Hyperloop, these are some of the neatest transportation concepts in the works today. More
Sponsors
Worry about the hackers you don't know 
Crime syndicates and government organizations pose a much greater cyber threat than renegade hacker groups like Anonymous. Play
GE CEO: Bringing jobs back to the U.S. 
Jeff Immelt says the U.S. is a cost competitive market for advanced manufacturing and that GE is bringing jobs back from Mexico. Play
Hamster wheel and wedgie-powered transit 
Red Bull Creation challenges hackers and engineers to invent new modes of transportation. Play

Most stock quote data provided by BATS. Market indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer. Morningstar: © 2018 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Factset: FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2018. All rights reserved. Chicago Mercantile Association: Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. Dow Jones: The Dow Jones branded indices are proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by DJI Opco, a subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and have been licensed for use to S&P Opco, LLC and CNN. Standard & Poor's and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. All content of the Dow Jones branded indices © S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2018 and/or its affiliates.