Goldman Sachs has been charged with not giving clients enough information before Eleanor Bloxham, contributor

(Fortune) -- One of the most worrisome parts of the Goldman Sachs case is that, in a way, the firm and its Board of directors have been down this road with the SEC before.

The degree and severity were quite different, but underlying both this and the earlier action is the same issue: adequate disclosure of information to clients.

In April 2003, Goldman (GS, Fortune 500) settled charges with the SEC related to the adequacy of the information provided to investor clients and client conflicts of interest. In settling the charges, Goldman agreed to "implement structural reforms" and "provide enhanced disclosures to investors".

The settlement also required Goldman to obey the rules of fair play outlined by the NYSE and NASD and institute controls over its sales and marketing materials processes required by those rules. This included establishing and maintaining a system to supervise the activities of its personnel in ways reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations.

Yet, here we are. In this latest case, the SEC contends that once again, the disclosure to investor clients was insufficient and as a result, securities laws were broken when hedge fund magnate John Paulson was allowed to have input in assembling a security he would later bet against, or short.

The case raises many troubling questions Goldman's Board of Directors will need to address.

For example, who at the firm was supervising the marketing materials provided to clients, including IKB, the German bank that bought the long side of the security, called Abacus 2007-AC1? What weaknesses might exist in internal controls that allowed the disclosure to IKB to exclude the fact that Paulson had helped assemble the security?

The Goldman board needs to review all results of internal audits of marketing material processes for potential weaknesses. If they haven't been receiving all relevant reports from internal audit, they need to correct that, right now.

To assess the processes with respect to disclosure to clients, in addition to internal reports, the board needs to review the case history with respect to previous SEC exams. Did the SEC pinpoint issues that management failed to address?

Further, the board needs to assess whether there are reviews that haven't been done that should now be instituted. They need to identify if there are any other aspects of the previous settlement that may not have been implemented thoroughly but should be -- and what their own role in oversight should be going forward.

One of the follow-on issues raised by the SEC in this case has been the timeliness and thoroughness of the disclosures related to the SEC investigation and the Wells notice, which Goldman also did not disclose to its shareholders.

As with the matters of client investor disclosure, this is not the first time issues related to shareholder disclosures have been raised in the context of Goldman Sachs.

To avoid another déjà vu moment, the Board will need to re-examine its own role in the oversight of shareholder disclosures and what changes may need to be implemented to ensure that shareholders receive complete and open disclosure.

The board at Goldman has seen its constitution change in light of the financial crisis, with Ruth Simmons, president of Brown University, standing down, and Rajat Gupta, a former head of McKinsey who is becoming entwined in the Galleon hedge fund scandal, resigning. Goldman is putting forth Lee Scott, the former CEO of Wal-mart (WMT, Fortune 500), as a candidate for one of the seats.

The change in constitution of the board could help Goldman deal with some of its issues head on. In its deliberations over the next few days, the Board should also consider the cultural issues at Goldman Sachs more broadly, particularly those that have contributed to this headline nightmare.

Time is of the essence for the Goldman Board now -- because even Goldman Sachs, even with huge profits announcements like today's, can't afford to live in a world of 12-15% share price drops every day.

Eleanor Bloxham is CEO of The Value Alliance and Corporate Governance Alliance, a board advisory firm. To top of page

Frontline troops push for solar energy
The U.S. Marines are testing renewable energy technologies like solar to reduce costs and casualties associated with fossil fuels. Play
25 Best Places to find rich singles
Looking for Mr. or Ms. Moneybags? Hunt down the perfect mate in these wealthy cities, which are brimming with unattached professionals. More
Fun festivals: Twins to mustard to pirates!
You'll see double in Twinsburg, Ohio, and Ketchup lovers should beware in Middleton, WI. Here's some of the best and strangest town festivals. Play
Company Price Change % Change
Apple Inc 99.02 1.35 1.38%
Facebook Inc 74.92 -0.27 -0.36%
Bank of America Corp... 15.50 -0.09 -0.58%
Dollar Tree Inc 54.87 0.65 1.20%
Family Dollar Stores... 75.74 15.08 24.86%
Data as of Jul 28
Index Last Change % Change
Dow 16,982.59 22.02 0.13%
Nasdaq 4,444.91 0.00 0.00%
S&P 500 1,978.91 0.57 0.03%
Treasuries 2.49 0.02 0.89%
Data as of 4:01am ET


Herbalife shares tumble after the maker of nutritional supplements reports earnings that fall short of analysts' estimates. More

New annual report from U.S. government shows the long-term prognosis for Medicare has improved thanks to slower health spending, while the outlook for Social Security remains unchanged. More

Online dating site OkCupid found its users were more likely to have conversations when it told them they were more compatible than in reality. More

Actor-founded This Bar Saves Lives had Hollywood connections, but learned Start-Up 101 the hard way. More

Steve Mason, a pastor from California, inherited more than $100,000 in student loan debt when his 27-year-old daughter died suddenly in 2009. With interest and late penalties, the debt has since ballooned to $200,000. More

Market indexes are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer Morningstar: © 2014 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer The Dow Jones IndexesSM are proprietary to and distributed by Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and have been licensed for use. All content of the Dow Jones IndexesSM © 2014 is proprietary to Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Chicago Mercantile Association. The market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2014. All rights reserved. Most stock quote data provided by BATS.