NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Long-term bond rates shot up dramatically at the end of last year. But the fixed income market has been, dare I say it, boring so far in January.
Is that all about to change now that President Obama has given the strongest indication yet of the need to tackle the deficit in Tuesday's State of the Union address?
The Federal Reserve, which concluded a two-day meeting Wednesday, also appears intent on buying Treasury debt in an attempt to keep rates low. It left its key short-term rate near zero yet again and made no significant change to other policies.
First and foremost, the renewed focus on getting the deficit under control should be a positive for bonds. A more manageable federal debt load would likely lead to a stronger dollar and less fear about inflation. That should push rates lower since bond prices and yields move in opposite directions.
"The stars may now be aligned on the deficit," said Leslie Barbi, head of fixed income for RS Investments in New York. "There should be some headway on that made in the first half of the year. The reality of getting something done should lower rates because there may no longer be this unbelievable supply of Treasuries out there."
Still, there's some skepticism about just how much the president and lawmakers will be able to get accomplished. That could keep bond investors from buying too much debt.
"The bond market has the impression that the president is serious about addressing debt levels. But there isn't enough detail to really grab on to," said Ray Humphrey, senior vice president at Hartford Investment Management Co. in Hartford, Conn. "It's one thing to talk the talk. Investors want the government to walk the walk and actually cut spending."
You also have to throw the Fed into the mix. Fed chair Ben Bernanke and the rest of his fellow merry policymakers committed in November to buy up to $600 billion in bonds through the end of June.
Although the central bank said at that time that it reserved the right to "adjust the program as needed" based on economic conditions, Barbi said she doubted the Fed would end QE2 prematurely.
She argued that QE2 may no longer be as necessary as it was late last year now that there are signs of improvement in the economy. But job growth remains stagnant. So that is likely to keep the Fed from pulling the plug on QE2 prematurely.
"The Fed has painted itself into a corner. It has to wait a few more months to have some proof that the unemployment rate has really come down. The Fed would look stupid if it changed things before that," she said.
Now here is where things get muddled. The purpose of QE2 is to keep long-term rates low. However, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury is now hovering around 3.4%. That's up a lot from 2.6% in early November.
But dubbing QE2 a failure may be a mistake. For one, a 10-year yield below 3.5% (or even 4% for that matter) is still a relatively low rate by historical standards.
The 10-year was yielding above 5% as recently as the summer of 2007 -- shortly before the credit crisis and recession began in earnest. So rates could even creep up a bit more and not really be considered problematic.
Anthony Valeri, fixed income strategist with LPL Financial in San Diego, said he thinks that the 10-year will probably bounce around between 3% and 4% for the remainder of the year. He argues that rates might already be significantly higher if the Fed wasn't stepping in as a buyer of last resort.
"The question is, 'What would rates be if QE2 was not in place?' Bernanke doesn't want yields to be that much higher," he said. "That's why the Fed will keep stressing that inflation is low and that the job market is still sluggish. That's a bond-market friendly statement."
And as I pointed out in a column last week, China still has a voracious, albeit slightly smaller, appetite for U.S. Treasuries. Demand from foreign governments will also probably help keep rates low.
What's more, the economy is not roaring, it's merely petering along. According to an exclusive CNNMoney survey, economists are forecasting GDP growth of 3.5% for the fourth quarter. That's good, but not enough to make people forget just how far the economy plunged in 2008 and 2009.
Add that up and that probably means that rates will stay in a tight range for some time, no matter what the Fed, the president and Congress do.
"We're not likely to see explosive growth for the economy coming out of this recession the way we had in prior ones," said Humphrey. "There will be low interest rates for a prolonged period."
Get into my big black car. Watching the State of the Union Tuesday night, I couldn't help but start humming a cynical classic rock song about elected officials. So, I thought, why not challenge my Twitter followers to be the first to identify it?
The lyric I chose was: "I support the left, though I'm leaning, leaning to the right." The answer was "Politician" by 60s Brit-rock supergroup Cream. (Ginger Baker: Most underrated drummer of that era? Discuss?)
Jim Lidstone, aka @jlidstone42, is the winner. He gets bonus points for also pointing out that the song was on the album "Wheels of Fire." Rock on, Jim. Preferably in a white room. With black curtains.
-- The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Paul R. La Monica. Other than Time Warner, the parent of CNNMoney, and Abbott Laboratories, La Monica does not own positions in any individual stocks.
|Overnight Avg Rate||Latest||Change||Last Week|
|30 yr fixed||3.88%||3.83%|
|15 yr fixed||2.84%||2.96%|
|30 yr refi||3.92%||3.94%|
|15 yr refi||2.94%||3.05%|
Today's featured rates:
There's now three stores you can buy an Apple Watch at. More
After years of talks, negotiators for the United States and 11 other nations are trying to hash out final terms of a controversial free-trade agreement. The Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, would make trade easier across many areas of business. More
There's now three stores you can buy an Apple Watch at. More
Smarties, a Halloween candy staple, have been around for 66 years. Three Millennial women are revolutionizing it. More
Spending more than you make is bad for your finances, but other not-so-obvious money habits will hurt your long-term savings. More