With many plans circulating and less than two weeks before its deadline, the debt committee still appears to be far from a deal they can sell to Congress.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The congressional debt committee has nine days to come up with a deficit reduction proposal.
There are basically three possible outcomes: The bipartisan panel reaches a deal; it doesn't reach a deal; or it reaches a partial deal.
Deal: To stave off automatic spending cuts known as a sequester, the super committee must propose ways to reduce deficits by at least $1.2 trillion over 10 years.
The panel's deadline for a vote is Nov. 23.
At least 7 of its 12 members must approve a plan in order to send it to the House and Senate in the form of legislation.
Then, both chambers must vote on the bill without amendment by Dec. 23. For the plan to pass, a simple majority in each chamber must vote in favor.
If both chambers approve the deal, the next stop will be the White House for President Obama's signature. If he signs it, the plan becomes law.
No deal: Of course, the super committee could just collapse under the weight of unyielding partisanship and vote down any potential deficit reduction plan.
Or even if it votes one through, Congress could vote it down or the president could veto it.
In any of those cases, Congress will face the threat of $1.2 trillion in automatic cuts in defense and nondefense spending starting in 2013.
Those cuts would be evenly divided between the two categories and would exempt Social Security and programs for low-income people, such as Medicaid. It would also limit cuts to Medicare.
At least that's how it's supposed to happen. But since Congress made the law governing the sequester, it can also amend or repeal it, as some lawmakers are pushing for.
Or, much less likely, lawmakers can use the 12 months before the sequester kicks in to pass their own deficit reduction measures to avoid automatic cuts.
Partial deal: What if the super committee splits the baby and approves a plan to reduce deficits by less than $1.2 trillion?
If such a plan is enacted, the sequester would make up for the difference between what the super committee proposed and $1.2 trillion. So if the committee settles on $600 billion, another $600 billion of automatic spending cuts would take effect in 2013, unless Congress changes the law.
There's another partial-deal scenario: The super committee agrees on some cuts but directs Congress to come up with the rest by a certain date. For instance, it could mandate that Congress enact tax reform that raises a certain amount of revenue for deficit reduction.
Those deficit savings won't help avert the automatic cuts, however, unless they are enacted before the sequester hits in 2013, said Sarah Binder, a senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution.
|GM's $1.3 billion recall cost wipes out profit|
|Coffee prices skyrocket after Brazil drought|
|Regulators pave way for Internet "fast lane" with net neutrality rules|
|Obamacare: One more reason to quit your job|
|Female gun instructors in hot demand|
|Overnight Avg Rate||Latest||Change||Last Week|
|30 yr fixed||4.28%||4.41%|
|15 yr fixed||3.30%||3.33%|
|30 yr refi||4.31%||4.39%|
|15 yr refi||3.35%||3.31%|
Today's featured rates:
|Latest Report||Next Update|
|Home prices||Aug 28|
|Consumer confidence||Aug 28|
|Manufacturing (ISM)||Sept 4|
|Inflation (CPI)||Sept 14|
|Retail sales||Sept 14|