A man smokes a cigarette in San Francisco last year.
The decision stems from a lawsuit federal prosecutors filed back in 1999 alleging that the companies violated racketeering statutes, deceiving the public about the consequences of smoking. The judge ruled against the defendants in a 2006 decision that set out the advertising requirements finalized Tuesday.
The case followed the tobacco industry's landmark $206 billion settlement in 1998.
The defendants were ordered to publish statements on their websites, as well as in ads in newspapers and on television and as inserts in cigarette packaging, acknowledging smoking's consequences. Among other things, the companies must say:
- "Smoking kills, on average, 1,200 Americans. Every day."
- "More people die every year from smoking than from murder, AIDS, suicide, drugs, car crashes, and alcohol, combined."
- "Secondhand smoke kills over 3,000 Americans each year."
Brian May, a spokesman for Philip Morris parent Altria Group (Fortune 500), said the company was "studying the court's decision." Bryan Hatchell, a spokesman for R.J. Reynolds, said his firm, too, was "reviewing the judge's ruling and considering next steps." , Lorillard Tobacco ( did not immediately respond to a request for comment. )
The companies had argued that some elements of the forced statements violated their First Amendment rights, a claim the judge rejected. The firms were ordered to begin discussions on how to implement the ruling next month, though that timeline could be extended with additional appeals.
|Stocks finish higher for fourth straight week|
|Oil-price manipulation: the next Libor?|
|Prison exclusive: Bernie Madoff can't sleep|
|Google says you'll know when Glass is sketchy|