CNNMoney.com
Companies Economy International Corrections Pre-market Trading After-hours Trading Winners/Losers/Actives Bonds Currencies Commodities World Markets Money Magazine Real Estate Taxes Jobs Ask the Expert Money 101 Autos Mutual Funds The Help Desk Loan Center Best Places to Live Ask the Expert Ultimate Guide to Retirement Retirement Calculators Rules of Retirement Best Funds Best Places to Retire Fortune Brainstorm Tech Apple 2.0 Blog Big Tech Blog Sectors and Stocks Tech Talk Resource Guide Small Business Makeovers Questions & Answers Small Business Video 100 Best Places to Launch FSB 100 Fortune Small Business Fortune 500 Brainstorm Tech Investing Management C-Suite Rankings Main Create Portfolio Edit Portfolio Create Alerts Edit Alerts
Multicore Processors
By Brian Caulfield

(Business 2.0) – Chip manufacturers have a problem, and it's a doozy: As chips get smaller and faster, they also run hotter. The trend can't continue, says IBM Systems and Technology Group VP Bernie Meyerson: "The point is to build microprocessors, not Mongolian barbecues."

Thankfully, the industry has begun eschewing faster chips in favor of etching several slower, cooler processors on a single silicon slab. In May, Intel publicly scrapped its new-product road map to fast-track so-called multicore designs. IBM will tap its existing multicore server processors for use in everything from game consoles to Apple computers. In August, AMD jumped ahead, demonstrating its first dual-core design. "With multicore going mainstream, this year marked the end of the gigahertz race," says Gordon Haff, a senior analyst with Illuminata. That's a good thing: Multicore chips are better equipped to handle the kind of multitasking that makes single processors sweat—like editing a home movie in one window while streaming tunes in another. — BRIAN CAULFIELD