CNNMoney.com
Companies Economy International Corrections Pre-market Trading After-hours Trading Winners/Losers/Actives Bonds Currencies Commodities World Markets Money Magazine Real Estate Taxes Jobs Ask the Expert Money 101 Autos Mutual Funds The Help Desk Loan Center Best Places to Live Ask the Expert Ultimate Guide to Retirement Retirement Calculators Best Funds Best Places to Retire Fortune Brainstorm Tech Apple 2.0 Blog Big Tech Blog Sectors and Stocks Tech Talk Resource Guide Small Business Makeovers Questions & Answers Small Business Video 100 Best Places to Launch FSB 100 Fortune Small Business Fortune 500 Brainstorm Tech Investing Management C-Suite Rankings Main Create Portfolio Edit Portfolio Create Alerts Edit Alerts
THE OKLAHOMA LOOPHOLE TAX SCAMS
By JEFFREY H. BIRNBAUM

(FORTUNE Magazine) – In Washington, you can never have too much of a good thing. Take empowerment zones. In 1993 these targeted tax breaks were a way to lure businesses back to inner cities. But rural lawmakers cried, "What about us?" So they got similar incentives. Soon, native Americans complained too and were added to the list. Then came Oklahoma, which boasts more native Americans than any other state, but no Indian reservations. The solution: give the tax breaks to "former Indian reservations in Oklahoma." The only problem was that two-thirds of Oklahoma, including Tulsa, became an Indian reservation for tax purposes.

Congress tried to fix the error earlier this year, but companies like Williams and Southwestern Bell were too quick: They already had claimed the tax breaks--which will save them and their fellow Oklahomans an estimated $12 million over two years. The companies said it wasn't fair for Uncle Sam to be an, um, Indian giver--and believe it or not, the lawmakers concurred. The loophole was tightened, but those who took sanctuary in the reservation clause kept their tax savings.

--Jeffrey H. Birnbaum