CNNMoney.com
Companies Economy International Corrections Pre-market Trading After-hours Trading Winners/Losers/Actives Bonds Currencies Commodities World Markets Money Magazine Real Estate Taxes Jobs Ask the Expert Money 101 Autos Mutual Funds The Help Desk Loan Center Best Places to Live Ask the Expert Ultimate Guide to Retirement Retirement Calculators Rules of Retirement Best Funds Best Places to Retire Fortune Brainstorm Tech Apple 2.0 Blog Big Tech Blog Sectors and Stocks Tech Talk Resource Guide Small Business Makeovers Questions & Answers Small Business Video 100 Best Places to Launch FSB 100 Fortune Small Business Fortune 500 Brainstorm Tech Investing Management C-Suite Rankings Main Create Portfolio Edit Portfolio Create Alerts Edit Alerts
A Better Way to Tax Mutual Funds?
By Pat Regnier

(MONEY Magazine) – In most ways, mutual funds make investing a whole lot easier. The one glaring exception: Each year, when a mutual fund distributes its capital gains, shareholders whose accounts are not tax deferred have to pay the Internal Revenue Service its due--even though they haven't sold their fund shares. It's not unheard of for investors to see a fund go into the red, yet still owe taxes just because the fund manager sold some holdings at profit.

But if Rep. Jim Saxton (R-N.J.) has his way, taxes on mutual fund distributions may soon be history. Saxton's bill, currently before the House Ways and Means Committee, would allow investors to receive up to $3,000 in capital-gains distributions per year without owing tax ($6,000 if married and filing jointly), provided that the gains are reinvested in the fund. This doesn't eliminate the capital-gains tax--you'd still owe after you sold shares, just the way investors do when they sell individual stocks.

--PAT REGNIER