SEATTLE (AP)--The format Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT) Office 2007 programs use to
save documents was approved as an international standard Tuesday, a step the
company touted as proof it is willing to make once-proprietary technology work
openly with competing programs.
But the International Standards Organization vote didn't quiet some opponents,
who argued that the Office Open XML standard still locks out competitors and
gives Microsoft customers no choice but to keep buying its programs forever.
The decision was made public on the Web site of a European standards
organization, Ecma International, on Tuesday. ISO is expected to formally
announce the vote Wednesday.
Years before Microsoft started selling Office 2007, its plan to switch to a
new way of saving Word, Excel and PowerPoint files sparked concerns that future
changes made by the software maker could render government or corporate archives
unreadable, especially by non-Microsoft programs.
In 2005, Massachusetts went so far as to direct state government offices to
save documents as OpenDocument Format files, already an ISO standard whose inner
workings were freely available to Microsoft and competing software makers alike.
The responsibility for maintaining standards falls to groups like ISO, not the
companies that developed them.
Massachusetts reversed its stance after Microsoft promised to turn over
responsibility for the OOXML format to Ecma International. In January 2007, Ecma
submitted OOXML to ISO, a broader international organization, for a sped-up
approval process.
Both Microsoft's OOXML and ODF - backed by Sun Microsystems Inc. (JAVA),
International Business Machines Corp. (IBM) and others - make it easier for
computer programs to read and understand the contents of a file. That helps
ensure older files will still be readable even if the program used to create
them has changed significantly.
Before Microsoft turned OOXML over to Ecma, the software maker had sole
control over the technology and no obligation to make it compatible with rivals'
products. Critics argued that Microsoft essentially gave customers no choice but
to stick with Office if they wanted documents to be readable in the future. They
also worried that Microsoft would drop support for OOXML someday, leaving
customers with no way to see old files.
Making OOXML a standard is meant to address both problems, and ensure that
competing programs can read and save OOXML files today and read them far into
the future, even if Microsoft moves on.
"The input from technical experts, customers and governments around the world
has greatly improved the Open XML specification and will make it even more
useful to developers and customers," said Tom Robertson, general manager of
interoperability and standards at Microsoft, in a statement. "We are committed
to supporting this specification in our products, and we will continue to work
with standards bodies, governments and the industry to promote greater
interoperability and innovation."
In an interview last week, Robertson said Microsoft and Ecma addressed almost
all the issues raised during the ISO process, but some critics remain
unsatisfied.
Even though Norway's standards body voted for OOXML, Steve Pepper, a member of
the organization, said Microsoft used strong-arm tactics to win approval.
"This vote is a tragedy for standardization," Pepper told the Associated Press
in Switzerland.
And Marino Marcich, head of the OpenDocument Format Alliance, said that
despite promised changes to the specification, "OOXML doesn't play well with the
products of other software companies" like IBM and Sun. He claimed that
Microsoft failed to fully document all the features in the format and that some
of the code was proprietary, leaving other companies vulnerable to copyright
lawsuits.
What's more, Marcich said, Microsoft can still use a version of OOXML in
Office 2007 that doesn't exactly match the one approved by ISO.
In a statement, Robertson said Microsoft is "committed to supporting this
specification in our products."
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
04-01-08 2044ET
Copyright (c) 2008 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.