Mattel fined $2.3 million over lead in toys

Government says fines against toymaker and its Fisher-Price division related to millions of recalled products in 2007.

EMAIL  |   PRINT  |   SHARE  |   RSS
 
google my aol my msn my yahoo! netvibes
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all CNNMoney.com RSS FEEDS (close)
By Parija B. Kavilanz, CNNMoney.com senior writer

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Toymaker Mattel Corp. agreed Friday to pay $2.3 million in civil penalties for violating a federal lead paint ban that resulted in the recall of millions of its Barbie, Dora and other popular-branded toys in 2007.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission said the fine against the No. 1 toymaker and its Fisher-Price pre-school division was the highest ever for the agency's regulated product violations and the third largest in its history.

While agreeing to the penalty, Mattel and Fisher-Price denied violating any laws, the CPSC said.

"This penalty should serve notice to toy makers that CPSC is committed to the safety of children, to reducing their exposure to lead, and to the implementation of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act," CPSC acting chairman Thomas Moore, said in a statement.

The agency said Mattel (MAT, Fortune 500) and Fisher-Price knowingly -- as defined in the Consumer Product Safety Act -- imported and sold children's toys with paints or other surface coatings that contained lead levels that violated a 30-year-old federal law.

In 1978, a federal ban was put in place that prohibited toys and other children's articles from having more than 0.06% lead by weight in paints or surface coatings.

The agency said the penalty settles allegations that Mattel imported up to 900,000 non-compliant toys between September 2006 and August 2007, including the Sarge toy car from the movie "Cars" and numerous Barbie accessory toys.

Fisher-Price imported up to 1.1 million non-compliant toys between July 2006 and August 2007, including certain licensed character toys, the agency said.

In 2007, about 95 Mattel and Fisher-Price toy models were determined to have exceeded this limit, the agency said. Lead can be toxic if ingested by young children and can cause adverse health consequences.

Mattel recalled millions of Chinese-manufactured toys in 2007 for both lead paint contamination and small parts hazards to young children.

In August of that year, Mattel recalled 1.5 million of its Fisher-Price branded products such as Elmo, Big Bird and Dora toys over risks associated with lead and small, high-powered magnets.

Three month later, the toymaker recalled another 9.5 million toys in the United States and 11 million in its overseas markets.

In August 2008, Congress passed the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, which gave makers and sellers of children's products such as toys, clothing and books have until Feb. 10, 2009 to comply with stricter standards for permissible lead, phthalate content limits and other mandatory safety requirements.

Following considerable pushback from toymakers who said the deadline was unrealistic and also applied to products that had already been shipped, the CPSC agreed to delay the deadline for the new testing and certification requirements by a year to Feb. 10, 2010.

"Today's settlement announcement by the U.S. CPSC resolves Mattel's outstanding issues with the agency related to certain matters that arose in 2007," according to a statement form Mattel.

"Mattel promptly took a series of steps after discovering compliance issues with some of our toys at that time. We were able to effectively minimize any potential concerns by launching a fast-track recall of the affected product in conjunction with the CPSC and other global regulatory agencies," the statement said.

"By taking several steps to enhance our product compliance protocols and procedures to confirm that every Mattel toy is safe for children to enjoy. Mattel continues to be vigilant and rigorous in ensuring the quality and safety of our toys," the company said. To top of page

Features
They're hiring!These Fortune 100 employers have at least 350 openings each. What are they looking for in a new hire? More
If the Fortune 500 were a country...It would be the world's second-biggest economy. See how big companies' sales stack up against GDP over the past decade. More
Sponsored By:
More Galleries
10 of the most luxurious airline amenity kits When it comes to in-flight pampering, the amenity kits offered by these 10 airlines are the ultimate in luxury More
7 startups that want to improve your mental health From a text therapy platform to apps that push you reminders to breathe, these self-care startups offer help on a daily basis or in times of need. More
5 radical technologies that will change how you get to work From Uber's flying cars to the Hyperloop, these are some of the neatest transportation concepts in the works today. More
Sponsors
Worry about the hackers you don't know 
Crime syndicates and government organizations pose a much greater cyber threat than renegade hacker groups like Anonymous. Play
GE CEO: Bringing jobs back to the U.S. 
Jeff Immelt says the U.S. is a cost competitive market for advanced manufacturing and that GE is bringing jobs back from Mexico. Play
Hamster wheel and wedgie-powered transit 
Red Bull Creation challenges hackers and engineers to invent new modes of transportation. Play

Most stock quote data provided by BATS. Market indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer. Morningstar: © 2018 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Factset: FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2018. All rights reserved. Chicago Mercantile Association: Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. Dow Jones: The Dow Jones branded indices are proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by DJI Opco, a subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and have been licensed for use to S&P Opco, LLC and CNN. Standard & Poor's and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. All content of the Dow Jones branded indices © S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2018 and/or its affiliates.