Is TARP bailout helping the economy?

As Treasury edges closer to extending the bailout another year, a congressional watchdog panel questions whether the rescue worked.

EMAIL  |   PRINT  |   SHARE  |   RSS
google my aol my msn my yahoo! netvibes
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all RSS FEEDS (close)
By Jennifer Liberto, senior writer

WASHINGTON ( -- As the Obama administration considers how to approach the next phase of the $700 billion financial bailout, questions are being raised on Capitol Hill about whether it is helping the economy.

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner told a congressional panel Thursday that the administration hopes to start winding down the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

Treasury officials have been talking about shutting down some TARP programs, while refocusing on areas like small business loans and mortgage modifications. TARP officially could end Dec. 31, but Treasury has the power to extend it through next fall.

"We are working to put the TARP out of its misery. And no one will be happier than I am ... to see that program terminated and unwound," Geithner told members of the Joint Economic Committee.

The hearing got heated at points, with Republican Rep. Kevin Brady of Texas asking Geithner to consider resigning, citing the struggling economy, "frightening" deficit and extensive job losses.

Also on Thursday, the Congressional Oversight Panel quizzed top economists about the bailout's effectiveness in helping to stabilize the economy.

The panel of experts said TARP helped avoid collapse of the financial system. But they also blasted TARP's design, structure and programs, and said it wasn't entirely fair or transparent.

"I think the TARP ends up being counter-productive in that it abused public faith," said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. "They oversold the benefits."

And few believed it has been helpful in propping up the economy.

"Housing stability efforts have been particularly disappointing," said Mark Zandi, chief economist and co-founder of Moody's "And of course small business lending has not worked at all."

The panel disagreed about whether the federal bailout program ultimately made banks safer and better capitalized.

Zandi said he thought the bailout worked well for the largest banks, which he called "over-capitalized." He also said that without TARP, the nation would still be in a recession.

But Baker said he was more skeptical about the health of large banks, especially since the stress tests performed by regulators last spring didn't anticipate the current levels of unemployment.

"Not to say that they're all going to collapse, but I'm less confident of their soundness going forward," said Baker. Many banks that are doing well are making their profits on trades and not bread-and-butter banking activities, he said.

Simon Johnson, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology economics professor, said he didn't believe the economy was a "stable system," especially since the largest banks can count on the government to bail them out if they get into big trouble.

"When you have an entity like Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500) that has direct access to the Federal Reserve ... and is allowed to take any kind of risky investment that they want, you're basically running a big hedge fund," Johnson said.

When asked whether TARP should be allowed to continue, the answers varied.

Alex Pollock, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, said he opposed extending the program.

"It is easy to imagine how much the Treasury and the administration would like to extend as long as possible the power and independent capacity they enjoy through the operation of TARP," Pollack said. "It is time to observe its target expiration date."

Johnson said he thought the bailout should be wound down, but that the money be kept in an emergency fund in case the recovery stumbles and veers back toward crisis again.

But Zandi and Charles Calomiris, a professor at Columbia University's business school, both said that TARP should be re-dedicated to helping homeowners with mortgages.

They believe that officials should abandon the current loan modification program and start a new one, where the government would give banks financial incentives to write down loan principal amounts.

"That's been the essence of what's been missing," Calomiris said. "The nice thing about that write down is it works to help marginal borrowers but not hopeless cases." To top of page

They're hiring!These Fortune 100 employers have at least 350 openings each. What are they looking for in a new hire? More
If the Fortune 500 were a country...It would be the world's second-biggest economy. See how big companies' sales stack up against GDP over the past decade. More
Sponsored By:
More Galleries
10 of the most luxurious airline amenity kits When it comes to in-flight pampering, the amenity kits offered by these 10 airlines are the ultimate in luxury More
7 startups that want to improve your mental health From a text therapy platform to apps that push you reminders to breathe, these self-care startups offer help on a daily basis or in times of need. More
5 radical technologies that will change how you get to work From Uber's flying cars to the Hyperloop, these are some of the neatest transportation concepts in the works today. More
Worry about the hackers you don't know 
Crime syndicates and government organizations pose a much greater cyber threat than renegade hacker groups like Anonymous. Play
GE CEO: Bringing jobs back to the U.S. 
Jeff Immelt says the U.S. is a cost competitive market for advanced manufacturing and that GE is bringing jobs back from Mexico. Play
Hamster wheel and wedgie-powered transit 
Red Bull Creation challenges hackers and engineers to invent new modes of transportation. Play

Most stock quote data provided by BATS. Market indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer. Morningstar: © 2018 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Factset: FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2018. All rights reserved. Chicago Mercantile Association: Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. Dow Jones: The Dow Jones branded indices are proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by DJI Opco, a subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and have been licensed for use to S&P Opco, LLC and CNN. Standard & Poor's and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. All content of the Dow Jones branded indices © S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2018 and/or its affiliates.