"Overworked" IRS unit treated like a "stepsister"

  @CNNMoney May 16, 2013: 2:01 PM ET
overworked irs

IRS staffers who reviewed applications from groups seeking charity tax exempt status were overworked, understaffed and lacked a layer of experienced middle managers.

WASHINGTON (CNNMoney)

The Internal Revenue Service group under fire in the current scandal was overworked, understaffed and lacked a layer of experienced middle managers, according to two former IRS employees.

"You have agents muddling through, trying to do their best with the law they're given, the workload they're given and with the folks they have at that office," said former IRS attorney Philip Hackney, who worked in Washington from 2006 to 2011, and advised Lois Lerner, director of the unit that approved applications from groups seeking tax-exempt status.

Staffing was "too small" to "quickly and accurately" review the volume of applications it was dealing with, according to Hackney.

Related: Probing questions, long delays for tea party groups

By 2012, the IRS was dealing with twice as many applications from groups wanting a tax-exempt charity status that would also allow them to dabble in politics. The trend began after a 2010 Supreme Court ruling allowed unlimited corporate and union campaign contributions.

Both Hackney and Marcus Owens, an attorney who ran the IRS' tax-exempt group under fire in the 1990s, say the group lacked a key layer of senior level agents and middle managers that might have caught these problems.

What's behind the IRS controversy?

Over the years, the Exempt Organizations group under fire was slow to replace managers and senior staff who departed or left the IRS, leaving it with what Hackney called a "vacuum of institutional knowledge."

"They just don't quite have the middle-level management that would have been telling them: 'Don't put 'Tea Party' in there as a search term,'" Hackney said.

Related: IRS scandal may unleash a flood of conservative donors

The Exempt Organizations unit was also treated more harshly than other parts of the IRS -- like a "stepsister," said Hackney, now a tax law professor at Louisiana State University.

Departments of the IRS that raise revenue tend to get more resources, he said. Reviewing charity applications doesn't raise any money.

The division receives 60,000 paper applications from groups seeking charity status each year.

"Of that 60,000 applications, the vast majority are from PTAs (parent teacher associations), scout troops and Little Leagues -- the main thing is getting their address right and we want to get them done quickly," said Owens, who is now an attorney at the tax advisory firm of Caplin & Drysdale. "Bobbing along in this river of applications are some real zingers."

Owens said it can be tough finding complicated applications that need a tougher review in a sea of applications.

The watchdog report confirms these accounts -- from 2010 through 2012, new "coordinators" and "managers" took over the case on 8 different occasions. The report doesn't detail how or why so many new faces came on board.

Generally, the IRS has been plagued with a wave of retirements and departures, losing some 10,000 employees in the past two years, or over 9% of its total workforce.

-- CNN's Brian Todd contributed to this report. To top of page



Join the Conversation
Overnight Avg Rate Latest Change Last Week
30 yr fixed4.36%4.24%
15 yr fixed3.39%3.26%
5/1 ARM3.36%3.27%
30 yr refi4.34%4.22%
15 yr refi3.38%3.24%
View rates in your area
 
Find personalized rates:
Rate data provided
by Bankrate.com
CNNMoney Sponsors
Market indexes are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer LIBOR Warning: Neither BBA Enterprises Limited, nor the BBA LIBOR Contributor Banks, nor Reuters, can be held liable for any irregularity or inaccuracy of BBA LIBOR. Disclaimer. Morningstar: © 2014 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer The Dow Jones IndexesSM are proprietary to and distributed by Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and have been licensed for use. All content of the Dow Jones IndexesSM © 2014 is proprietary to Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Chicago Mercantile Association. The market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2014. All rights reserved. Most stock quote data provided by BATS.