Will Obama tax plan really save jobs?

President says his proposals to change tax breaks for U.S. multinationals will spur employment. Experts don't think so.

EMAIL  |   PRINT  |   SHARE  |   RSS
 
google my aol my msn my yahoo! netvibes
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all CNNMoney.com RSS FEEDS (close)
By Jeanne Sahadi, CNNMoney.com senior writer

chart_obama_tax2.gif

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Obama says his proposals to crack down on corporate tax loopholes will do a lot of things, including create more U.S. jobs.

"We will stop letting American companies that create jobs overseas take deductions on their expenses when they do not pay any American taxes on their profits," Obama said when announcing his proposals.

In turn, Obama said, the government would offer a tax cut to companies that do their research and development in the United States. And that will "jump-start job creation," he said.

Will it work? Tax policy experts and corporate lobbyists are dubious. They say that his proposals, if implemented, could raise revenue for the government but are not likely to spark an increase in U.S. jobs.

Among the changes Obama wants is to require U.S.-based multinationals to defer taking deductions on expenses related to their foreign operations until they bring back the profits to the United States and pay U.S. income tax on them.

Doing so would reduce some of the tilt in the tax code that makes it more advantageous for companies to invest abroad, said one Democratic aide on Capitol Hill.

But U.S. tax policy is not the only factor a company weighs in deciding whether to invest beyond the borders.

For instance, companies go abroad primarily to sell products abroad, said Rosanne Altshuler, co-director of the Tax Policy Center. In 2006, she noted, only 10.5% of sales of U.S. controlled foreign subsidiaries were sent back to the United States.

"And there are a lot of advantages to having the production close to the place of final sale," Altshuler said. One is lower transportation costs.

Indeed, total manufacturing cost is the most compelling reason to move operations abroad, and countries actively woo companies with tax holidays and other incentives, said Sang Kim, a partner in international tax practice of the global law firm DLA Piper. Kim's practice doesn't lobby, but DLA Piper does and a company representative said it might do so on Obama's proposals.

"Even if all this passes, will it create factories in the United States? Absolutely not," Kim said.

Some say Obama's plan won't create jobs because tax policy has a limited influence on jobs.

"Employment is determined by overall demand for goods and services, not by targeted tax and spending provisions," Eric Toder, a fellow at the liberal Urban Institute and former assistant secretary of tax analysis for the Treasury Department, wrote in the Tax Policy Center's blog Tax Vox.

Research credit: Welcome but expected

The proposal that the president leans on most heavily as an engine for job-creation is his call to make permanent the credit for companies that do their R&D in the United States.

Even critics of Obama's proposals like the idea because it would create greater certainty in companies' planning and because it reduces the net cost of hiring.

But, they say, companies weren't really worried about losing the credit because lawmakers have renewed it annually. So making it permanent is unlikely to have a robust effect on hiring plans, especially since the president's other proposals would likely result in a higher tax bill for U.S. multinationals.

Critics also contend that increasing the tax bite on U.S. companies will put them at a disadvantage with their foreign competitors. That could make it more appealing for a U.S. company to become foreign owned if it means a lighter tax burden.

And ultimately, they say, that could mean a loss of U.S. jobs.

"The damage [over time] to the U.S. as a significant player in the world would be considerable," said Gary Clyde Hufbauer, Reginald Jones senior fellow of the Peterson Institute. "It would erode U.S. production structures abroad."

Hufbauer also notes, however, that foreign companies provide roughly 6 million jobs in the United States. That suggests that even if some U.S. companies were to be bought by foreign competitors, overall employment might not fall.

For instance, the decline in U.S. manufacturing employment is down among U.S.-owned manufacturers, a 2008 report by the Joint Committee on Taxation noted.

"But the decline has been largely offset by employment at foreign-owned manufacturing facilities located in the United States." To top of page

Features
They're hiring!These Fortune 100 employers have at least 350 openings each. What are they looking for in a new hire? More
If the Fortune 500 were a country...It would be the world's second-biggest economy. See how big companies' sales stack up against GDP over the past decade. More
Sponsored By:
More Galleries
9 reasons to be excited about Windows 9 Microsoft is expected to begin showing off Windows 9's features later this month. Here are the expected changes you should be thrilled about. More
8 must-have travel apps Whether you've got wanderlust or an airline grievance, here are some apps to pack onto your phone. More
Hot stocks: 10 record breaking companies The S&P 500 is trading at all-time highs, and many well-known businesses are leading the charge. Time to buy or sell? More
Worry about the hackers you don't know 
Crime syndicates and government organizations pose a much greater cyber threat than renegade hacker groups like Anonymous. Play
GE CEO: Bringing jobs back to the U.S. 
Jeff Immelt says the U.S. is a cost competitive market for advanced manufacturing and that GE is bringing jobs back from Mexico. Play
Hamster wheel and wedgie-powered transit 
Red Bull Creation challenges hackers and engineers to invent new modes of transportation. Play

Market indexes are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer Morningstar: © 2014 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer The Dow Jones IndexesSM are proprietary to and distributed by Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and have been licensed for use. All content of the Dow Jones IndexesSM © 2014 is proprietary to Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Chicago Mercantile Association. The market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2014. All rights reserved. Most stock quote data provided by BATS.