Banks add 'pay czar' clause to contracts - source

Citigroup, Bank of America and AIG add a line to employment contracts such that compensation agreements are subject to the approval of the government.

EMAIL  |   PRINT  |   SHARE  |   RSS
 
google my aol my msn my yahoo! netvibes
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all CNNMoney.com RSS FEEDS (close)

Photos
10 biggest CEO paychecks
Including salary, bonuses, stock and options, these public company CEOs took home pay packages last year worth up to $104 million.
Should Ben Bernanke be reconfirmed for a second term as Fed chairman?
  • Yes
  • No

NEW YORK (Reuters) -- Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp. and AIG are forging new employment contracts that let them void compensation agreements if they are challenged by the U.S. government, according to a person familiar with some recent contracts.

According to excerpts of contracts obtained by Reuters, banks recently began inserting clauses stating that the pacts are subject to the approval of the government's "pay czar." Compensation terms would also be subject to limitations or clawback provisions imposed by the U.S. Treasury, as well as other legal and regulatory requirements.

The clauses show how banks are trying to juggle competing demands of employees, who want the most pay possible, and government officials, who recognize that massive Wall Street bonuses do not play well on Main Street.

"If you enter into an agreement and the pay czar comes back and says, 'You can't pay that,' then you would be stuck between a contractual obligation to the individual and a legislative or government mandate," said Laura Thatcher, who leads the executive compensation practice at law firm Alston & Bird in Atlanta.

Citigroup (C, Fortune 500), Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) and American International Group Inc. (AIG, Fortune 500) declined to comment.

Lavish Wall Street compensation has come under intense public scrutiny since last fall, when Congress agreed to pump $700 billion of taxpayer money into banks, brokers and insurers gutted by the credit crisis.

Lawmakers and others have criticized banks that continued to earmark big bonuses and arrange luxury outings even as average Americans struggled with a slowing economy.

Employment contracts came into focus as banks, under pressure to slash pay, said some bonuses were mandated under pacts that could not be broken.

For example, AIG, the giant insurer swamped by credit derivative losses, forged ahead in March with paying $165 million in bonuses due to employees largely responsible for the company's losses.

During the past month, media reports have questioned how Kenneth Feinberg, the Obama administration's pay czar, will handle the matter of Andrew Hall, an energy trader with Citi's Phibro unit who is expected to make $100 million this year.

Citi, Bank of America, AIG, Chrysler Financial, Chrysler Group LLC, General Motors Co. and GMAC Inc. -- all still locked in the U.S. Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program -- have submitted proposed compensation plans for their 25 highest-paid employees. Feinberg is reviewing the proposals.

Some banks contend they will lose key personnel if Feinberg takes a hard line to curb outsized bonuses.

One new contract reviewed by Reuters requires employees to "sign a waiver of any claims against the United States ... and the company, and the respective directors, officers, employees and agents of ... the company."

Another contract said "any payment of any kind" must comply with the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the law that provided the funds to shore up weakened banks.

AIG's offer letter to Robert Benmosche, the firm's new CEO, included the disclaimer that his compensation was subject to the "formal review and approval" of the pay czar and any other "applicable regulations," according to a regulatory filing.

"You may receive compensation from AIG only to the extent that it is consistent with those regulations," the letter said. To top of page

Features
They're hiring!These Fortune 100 employers have at least 350 openings each. What are they looking for in a new hire? More
If the Fortune 500 were a country...It would be the world's second-biggest economy. See how big companies' sales stack up against GDP over the past decade. More
Sponsored By:
More Galleries
Want to buy -- and live in -- a piece of history? It's not that far out of reach. These historic homes are not only for sale, they are incredible bargains. More
5 ways retailers are tracking you If you think pesky salespeople are invading your personal space, check out these 5 technologies that are tracking your movements throughout a store. More
Moto X vs. Droid Turbo: Which Droid should you buy? Motorola has made the two best Android smartphones this year. Here's how they stack up. More
Worry about the hackers you don't know 
Crime syndicates and government organizations pose a much greater cyber threat than renegade hacker groups like Anonymous. Play
GE CEO: Bringing jobs back to the U.S. 
Jeff Immelt says the U.S. is a cost competitive market for advanced manufacturing and that GE is bringing jobs back from Mexico. Play
Hamster wheel and wedgie-powered transit 
Red Bull Creation challenges hackers and engineers to invent new modes of transportation. Play

Copyright 2009 Reuters All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Most stock quote data provided by BATS. Market indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer.

Morningstar: © 2014 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Factset: FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2014. All rights reserved.

Chicago Mercantile Association: Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Dow Jones: The Dow Jones branded indices are proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by DJI Opco, a subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and have been licensed for use to S&P Opco, LLC and CNN. Standard & Poor's and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. All content of the Dow Jones branded indices © S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2014 and/or its affiliates.