Our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy have changed.

By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to the new Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Personal Finance > Your Home
Top 10 housing markets
Home values rose in most places during 2002, and in some hot markets prices jumped more than 20%.
February 25, 2003: 2:53 PM EST
By Sarah Max, CNN/Money Staff Writer

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - The bummer economy and stagnant stock market did little to damper the housing boom in many parts of the country last year.

In fact, 39 out of 120 markets tracked by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) saw double-digit gains in home prices between the fourth quarter of 2001 and the fourth quarter of 2002. That was an all-time record, according to the NAR, which released its latest home price data Wednesday.

Leading the way was California's capital city, Sacramento. Here, the median price for an existing single-family home increased 26.7 percent to $224,209 during the time frame.

10 Hottest Housing Markets
Thirty-nine markets had double-digit gains.
MarketIncreaseMedian Price
Sacramento, Calif.26.7%$224,200
San Diego, Calif.26.6%$379,300
Providence, R.I.24.6%$206,100
Nassau-Suffolk, N.Y. 23.6%$333,600
Monmouth-Ocean, N.J.22.1%$261,700
Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, Fla.20.9%$115,600
Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood-Pompano Bch, Fla.20.8%$204,800
Anaheim-Santa Ana, Calif.20.4%$434,600
New York-North N.J.-Long Island, N.Y. 20.2%$320,300
Bradenton, Fla.20.1%$156,800
National Average8.8%$161,600
Based on year-over-year change
Source:National Association of Realtors

Two other California cities were among the top 10 real estate markets, as well. In San Diego, for example, the median home price surged 26.6 percent to $379,300, while prices in Orange County jumped more than 20 percent to $434,600.

"In the last two years housing has been the beneficiary of a weak economy," said David Lereah, NAR's chief economist. The downturn, he notes, brought long-term mortgage rates to the lowest levels in decades and made homeownership more affordable than ever.

On a national level, the median price for an existing, single-family home was $161,600 in the fourth quarter of 2002, up nearly 9 percent over the same period last year, when the median price stood at $148,500, NAR reports. That was the highest year-over-year increase in more than 20 years.

See prices for more than 100 cities

Interest rates were the most important factor behind last year's thriving real estate market, but a lean inventory for homes, more available credit for first-time home buyers, and favorable demographic trends and also helped boost demand for houses.

More on housing
The latest mortgage rates
Will real estate stay hot in 2003?
The latest on housing affordability
Buying in an up-and-coming neighborhood

"There is a strong push among immigrants to purchase homes," said Celia Chen, senior economist for "About a decade ago this country had a surge in immigrants who have only recently begun the home-buying process."

Although prices in 2002 were generally higher than they were in 2001, there was some softening over the course of the year. For example, prices in Monmouth and Ocean counties in New Jersey were $273,500 in the third quarter of 2002 but fell to $261,700 in the fourth quarter. Even so, that's still 22 percent higher than it was at the end of 2001.

10 Worst Housing Markets
Home prices in these areas fell.
MarketDecreaseMedian Price
Biloxi-Gulfport, Miss.-6.0%$100,400
Albuquerque, N.M.-5.1%$134,900
Charleston, W.V.-3.6%$106,400
Beaumont, Texas-2.4%$81,500
Kalamazoo, Mich.-2.0%$116,500
Peoria, Ill.-1.8%$87,000
Ft. Wayne, Ind.-1.7%$93,100
Toledo, Ohio-0.5%$108,400
Austin/San Marcos, Texas-0.5%$151,000
Columbus, Ohio-0.4%$135,700
Based on year-over-year change.
Source:National Association of Realtors

Not every market, however, saw values rise from 2001. In 11 markets, prices stayed flat or fell. Worst off was Biloxi-Gulfport, Miss., where the median value fell 6 percent to $100,400. In Albuquerque, N.M., prices fell 5.1 percent; in Charleston W.Va., they were down 3.6 percent; in Beaumont, Texas, they fell 2.4 percent; and in Kalamazoo, Mich., home prices were 2.0 percent lower.

But those markets are the exception rather than the rule. And they don't necessarily suggest a broader downturn for real estate prices this year. According to Lereah, market is likely to hold up in 2003, but probably won't break any new records.

(For more on the outlook for real estate in 2003, click here.)  Top of page

  More on YOUR HOME
Your Home: Bracing for higher rates
Refinancing demand lags again
A rose is (not) a rose
Donald Trump's denial challenged by reporter
They still can't put a price on this diamond
Volkswagen is giving workers a very long holiday

graphic graphic