CNNMoney.com
Companies Economy International Corrections Pre-market Trading After-hours Trading Winners/Losers/Actives Bonds Currencies Commodities World Markets Money Magazine Real Estate Taxes Jobs Ask the Expert Money 101 Autos Mutual Funds The Help Desk Loan Center Best Places to Live Ask the Expert Ultimate Guide to Retirement Retirement Calculators Best Funds Best Places to Retire Fortune Brainstorm Tech Apple 2.0 Blog Big Tech Blog Sectors and Stocks Tech Talk Resource Guide Small Business Makeovers Questions & Answers Small Business Video 100 Best Places to Launch FSB 100 Fortune Small Business Fortune 500 Brainstorm Tech Investing Management C-Suite Rankings Main Create Portfolio Edit Portfolio Create Alerts Edit Alerts
Karzai: One term is enough
Fortune Exclusive: The first democratically elected Afghan president suggests he won't run again -- and gives a frank assessment of his first five years on the job.
By Eric Ellis, Fortune Magazine

KABUL, Afghanistan (Fortune International) -- Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai has strongly suggested he will serve just one term as Afghan leader and not contest his country's next presidential election scheduled for 2009. In an exclusive interview with Fortune, the 49-year-old Karzai said, "I don't think it is good to be running all the time. Let other people get a chance to run."

Karzai, who became his country's first democratically elected president in December 2004, added: "I want to leave a good legacy for Afghanistan. I want to have this country stable and constitutionally strong. I want to have this country left with a stable environment of alternative leaders."

karzai.03.jpg
Hamid Karzai: "Let other people get a chance to run," the 49-year-old Afghan leader told Fortune.

While the election is still three years away, Karzai's remarks raise significant questions for his desperately poor country and for the international community that props it up - questions of who might replace him, how as much as $20 billion in foreign aid is dispersed, and what impact a lame-duck presidency might have on a government engaged in a battle with a resurgent Taliban in its restive southern provinces.

Karzai became Afghanistan's leader in December 2001, when he was appointed chairman, and later president, of a Washington-backed transitional administration formed after U.S. forces toppled the Taliban two months after the World Trade Center bombing in 2001.

In a frank discussion held in his office in Kabul's presidential palace on July 31, Karzai made a series of revelatory comments and claims.

• "There is corruption in the whole system" of Afghanistan's government and that citizens were increasingly angry at the waste and profligate spending by foreign aid organizations.

• His government controls "the whole country," despite a growing Taliban insurgency in six southern provinces, and that Afghanistan is mostly secure.

• He had underestimated the task of eradicating opium poppy production, which now comprises a third of the Afghan economy, and admitted that "lots of people" in his administration benefited financially from poppy production.

• The international community had weakened his government by rewarding regional pro-U.S. warlords for their role in the Taliban's ouster, though he insisted there were no warlords in his cabinet or administration.

• His government had been successful and ahead of his targets, in boosting the economy and raising income and living standards in Afghanistan. But domestic revenue collection was "absolutely shameful" and was hindering self-sustaining economic development.

Asked why he isn't a stronger leader, given his near unanimous support internationally, Karzai said, "The international community did not stand with me on these issues. They didn't four years ago, when I asked them to. I had to work through internal and external factors and take Afghanistan to where we are today. And I am very proud of that. [But] the international community could have helped us better."

Karzai said that Afghanistan's economy was booming and that legal per capita income had doubled to $355 annually since he came to office.

But, he added, "We are still among the poorest in the world. While we have better roads, we are still the worst in the world. While we have improved our supply of electricity, we are still the worst in the world.

While our education has picked up a lot, we are among the worst. We still have the lowest literacy rates in the world. We are still the worst in child mortality. If you asked me, has the country succeeded in terms of economic recovery, [I would say] yes, massively. But is Afghanistan a rich place? No."

______________________

More from Fortune:

Can AOL keep pace? The old dial-up service plays catch-up by going free, but Fortune's Stephanie Mehta argues the plan's unlikely to result in big gains.

$3-plus for gas, but we keep buying more Americans are likely to use more fuel than ever this summer, despite record-high prices.

Malaysia Airlines' high hopes for a low cost model Malaysian government turns to Air Asia to bail out state-owned airline.  Top of page

YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS
Follow the news that matters to you. Create your own alert to be notified on topics you're interested in.

Or, visit Popular Alerts for suggestions.
Manage alerts | What is this?
© 2009 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 BigCharts.com Inc. All rights reserved. Please see our Terms of Use.
MarketWatch, the MarketWatch logo, and BigCharts are registered trademarks of MarketWatch, Inc.
Intraday data provided by Interactive Data Real-Time Services and subject to the Terms of Use.
Intraday data is at least 20-minutes delayed. All times are ET.
Historical, current end-of-day data, and splits data provided by Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data.
Fundamental data provided by Morningstar, Inc..
SEC Filings data provided by Edgar Online Inc..
Earnings data provided by FactSet CallStreet, LLC.