CNNMoney.com
Companies Economy International Corrections Pre-market Trading After-hours Trading Winners/Losers/Actives Bonds Currencies Commodities World Markets Money Magazine Real Estate Taxes Jobs Ask the Expert Money 101 Autos Mutual Funds The Help Desk Loan Center Best Places to Live Ask the Expert Ultimate Guide to Retirement Retirement Calculators Rules of Retirement Best Funds Best Places to Retire Fortune Brainstorm Tech Apple 2.0 Blog Big Tech Blog Sectors and Stocks Tech Talk Resource Guide Small Business Makeovers Questions & Answers Small Business Video 100 Best Places to Launch FSB 100 Fortune Small Business Fortune 500 Brainstorm Tech Investing Management C-Suite Rankings Main Create Portfolio Edit Portfolio Create Alerts Edit Alerts
Allen Wastler Commentary:
Wastler's Wanderings by Allen Wastler Column archive

The jobs-number 'conspiracy'

Was it good? Was it bad? You can see a conspiracy in any number, if you try.


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Numbers lie. Especially economic ones. But some of you already knew that.

And it's all a conspiracy.

Take the employment numbers Friday. The government reported that 92,000 jobs were added to U.S. payrolls. Its previous estimate of jobs created in September was revised from 51,000 to 148,000. And the unemployment rate dropped to 4.4 percent.

Despite our best efforts, the conservative conspiracy was apparent.

"I had to laugh at your story on job creation and unemployment," Miguel G. wrote to us. "How in the hell do you revise the number of jobs created in September from 51,000 to 139,000? (sic) Why does Bush even report the numbers if he's just going to change them a month later? Anything from his fanatical Christian government is pure lies."

Or was it a liberal conspiracy?

"Just curious if you'll be leading your newscasts off today with the new unemployment rate?" David W. flamed. "Our economy is good and it's about time you liberals in the media stop hiding that fact. Tell the truth on the economy and perhaps you'll gain more viewers."

Half-empty, half-full? You're tagged either way.

Either view is right. The employment report is actually made up of two different surveys ... one of employers (the payroll number) and one of households (the unemployment rate). Economists frequently debate the merits of the two and what they do and don't count. The payroll number doesn't reflect the self-employed all that well, say some. The household number doesn't reflect all the people who gave up looking for a job, say others. It's the stuff number-cruncher cage matches are made of.

There's a fight like this about every economic number:

The leading indicators are actually lagging.

The gross domestic product doesn't give the service sector its due.

Shouldn't food and energy be considered "core" to inflation calculations?

And on and on.

Numbers are tools, not absolutes. And they can be imperfect. Just as the screwdriver in your hand probably isn't the right thing to chisel out that nail. But that's all you've got, so you use it anyway.

The jobs report? It probably isn't absolutely right. And in this election season it is getting spun this way and that.

But I'm seeing a lot of "Help Wanted" signs these days. Sure, I see them at places like McDonald's, the local nail salon, and the mall retailers. ... so they probably aren't high-paying jobs. But they are jobs nonetheless.

So the jobs report, warts and all, is probably closer to right than wrong.

And the conspiracy? There isn't one, unless you count imperfection and hype.

Next? Let's go count some votes ....

_________________________________

Allen Wastler is Managing Editor of CNNMoney.com and appears on CNN's "In the Money." He can be emailed at wastlerswanderings@cnn.com. Top of page

YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS
Follow the news that matters to you. Create your own alert to be notified on topics you're interested in.

Or, visit Popular Alerts for suggestions.
Manage alerts | What is this?
© 2009 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy. Advertising Practices.
Copyright © 2009 BigCharts.com Inc. All rights reserved. Please see our Terms of Use.
MarketWatch, the MarketWatch logo, and BigCharts are registered trademarks of MarketWatch, Inc.
Intraday data provided by Interactive Data Real-Time Services and subject to the Terms of Use.
Intraday data is at least 20-minutes delayed. All times are ET.
Historical, current end-of-day data, and splits data provided by Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data.
Fundamental data provided by Morningstar, Inc..
SEC Filings data provided by Edgar Online Inc..
Earnings data provided by FactSet CallStreet, LLC.