CNNMoney.com
Companies Economy International Corrections Pre-market Trading After-hours Trading Winners/Losers/Actives Bonds Currencies Commodities World Markets Money Magazine Real Estate Taxes Jobs Ask the Expert Money 101 Autos Mutual Funds The Help Desk Loan Center Best Places to Live Ask the Expert Ultimate Guide to Retirement Retirement Calculators Best Funds Best Places to Retire Fortune Brainstorm Tech Apple 2.0 Blog Big Tech Blog Sectors and Stocks Tech Talk Resource Guide Small Business Makeovers Questions & Answers Small Business Video 100 Best Places to Launch FSB 100 Fortune Small Business Fortune 500 Brainstorm Tech Investing Management C-Suite Rankings Main Create Portfolio Edit Portfolio Create Alerts Edit Alerts
PARTNER
CENTER

Study says home prices not falling

In contrast to other reports, a Federal index shows house prices are higher than a year ago.

By Les Christie, CNNMoney.com staff writer

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Most studies say U.S. home prices are on the decline, but a new report from the federal government says just the opposite.

The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), which has tracked prices for more than 30 years, said Thursday its housing price index grew 4.3 percent in the first quarter compared with a year ago. It was the slowest rate of growth in 10 years, however.

Mortgage estimator
Estimate monthly housing payments
Price of home:
Downpayment:
Interest rate:     %
Yearly property taxes:
Yearly homeowner's insurance:
CALCULATE  

Earlier this month, the National Association of Realtors reported the latest national average home price dropped 1.8 percent in the first quarter compared with a year ago. The Case-Shiller index, based, in part on OFHEO data, also showed a drop in prices.

Part of the disparity between the OFHEO index and NAR prices may stem form the way each organization calculates change.

OFHEO's housing price index looks at differences in values when single-family homes are resold or refinanced. When borrowers refinance their mortgages, new home-value appraisals are made, and those numbers are factored into the OFHEO index.

(The agency has an additional index for purchase-only deals and reported that the values of homes sold during the 12-month period ended March 31 had risen slightly less than the overall index's 4.3 percent climb.)

NAR simply calculates the median sale price for each housing market. The median is a midpoint: it eliminates the impact an unusually large number of extremely expensive or very cheap properties would have on mean averages.

The values that NAR comes up with, however, do not take into account differences in the mix of homes sold. If more starter homes in lower-income neighborhoods were sold, and fewer larger homes in expensive neighborhoods changed hands, it could skew median prices lower.

And if a fast-growing area was adding virtually nothing but much cheaper houses, that would also make it seem like prices were increasing at a slower rate than they might actually be growing.

OFHEO hopes to get a clearer picture of house values by comparing selling prices of specific homes over time. Although it's considered an accurate barometer of prime movements and amplitudes, however, the OFHEO index has its own quirks.

The agency draws its data from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored enterprises that purchase mortgage loans. Those agencies have limits to the size of loans they buy, which leaves out the impact of transactions involving more expensive homes.

The OFHEO index also may not account for additions to the living spaces of homes or changes in their general conditions.

One of its strengths, however, is that it does incorporate the statistics on some 31 million same-sale transactions over the years.

The OFHEO's index for the first quarter revealed that the metro area with the highest rate of home-price appreciation over the 12 months ended March 31, 2006 was Wenatchee, Washington, where houses jumped in value by a resounding 25.6 percent.

Other impressive increases were in Provo-Orem, Utah (19.7 percent) and Salt Lake City (19.1 percent).

Poorly performing metro areas included Punta Gorda, Florida, where prices fell 4.6 percent, Sacramento and Modesto, California, both down 4.4 percent.

Of the total of 285 metro areas listed, 237 had positive four-quarter appreciation, 46 had price declines, and prices were unchanged in two cities. Top of page



© 2009 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 BigCharts.com Inc. All rights reserved. Please see our Terms of Use.
MarketWatch, the MarketWatch logo, and BigCharts are registered trademarks of MarketWatch, Inc.
Intraday data provided by Interactive Data Real-Time Services and subject to the Terms of Use.
Intraday data is at least 20-minutes delayed. All times are ET.
Historical, current end-of-day data, and splits data provided by Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data.
Fundamental data provided by Morningstar, Inc..
SEC Filings data provided by Edgar Online Inc..
Earnings data provided by FactSet CallStreet, LLC.