| Revenues | Profits | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Company | Fortune 500 rank | $ millions | % change from 2008 | $ millions | % change from 2008 |
| 1 | Procter & Gamble | 22 | 79,697.0 | -4.6 | 13,436.0 | 11.3 |
| 2 | Kimberly-Clark | 126 | 19,115.0 | -1.5 | 1,884.0 | 11.5 |
| 3 | Colgate-Palmolive | 151 | 15,327.0 | 0.0 | 2,291.0 | 17.1 |
| 4 | Avon Products | 228 | 10,382.8 | -2.9 | 625.8 | -28.5 |
| 5 | Estée Lauder | 308 | 7,323.8 | -7.4 | 218.4 | -53.9 |
| 6 | Clorox | 384 | 5,450.0 | 3.4 | 537.0 | 16.5 |
| Rank | Company | Revenues % | Assets % | Stockholders' Equity % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Procter & Gamble | 16.9 | 10.0 | 21.3 |
| 2 | Kimberly-Clark | 9.9 | 9.8 | 34.9 |
| 3 | Colgate-Palmolive | 14.9 | 20.6 | 73.5 |
| 4 | Avon Products | 6.0 | 9.2 | 49.2 |
| 5 | Estée Lauder | 3.0 | 4.2 | 13.3 |
| 6 | Clorox | 9.9 | 11.7 | N.A. |
| Earnings Per Share | Total Return to Investors | Employees | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Company | 1999-2009 Annual growth (%) | 1999-2009 Annual rate (%) | 2009 (%) | Number | % change from 2008 |
| 1 | Procter & Gamble | 12.6 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 135,000 | -2.2 |
| 2 | Kimberly-Clark | 3.9 | 2.7 | 26.3 | 56,000 | 5.7 |
| 3 | Colgate-Palmolive | 11.5 | 4.2 | 22.9 | 38,100 | 4.1 |
| 4 | Avon Products | 9.5 | 8.8 | 35.5 | 41,000 | -2.4 |
| 5 | Estée Lauder | 0.7 | 0.6 | 57.9 | 31,300 | -2.2 |
| 6 | Clorox | 14.0 | 4.3 | 13.7 | 8,300 | 0.0 |
| Rank # of Fortune 500 Companies | |
|---|---|
| California | 57 |
| Texas | 57 |
| New York | 56 |
| Company | Rank |
|---|---|
| Microsoft | 36 |
| Goldman Sachs | 39 |
| Cisco Systems | 58 |
| Company | 2009 $ (millions) |
|---|---|
| Exxon Mobil | $19,280.0 |
| Microsoft | $14,569.0 |
| Wal-Mart Stores | $14,335.0 |
