Apple comes clean on iPod manufacturing
After reports surfaced in June of unseemly labor conditions at Foxconn, one of Apple's major contract manufacturers, Apple launched its own investigation. Now, the Mac and iPod maker has published the results. Mostly, Apple gave its suppliers a clean bill of health. The report notes that their pay levels do meet China's minimum wage laws, in response to concerns about the factory workers' low pay. But it also noted problems with a lack of privacy in some off-campus dormitories and a lack of transparency in workers' paychecks due to a complex scheme of bonuses for skills and attendance, as well as deductions for meals and housing. The workers' single biggest complaint? There's not enough overtime available during nonpeak periods.
"Good job, Apple," says The Unofficial Apple Weblog. "Here's hoping that some people's lives will improve just a little bit because of all this." TUAW notes that Apple has hired Verité, a nonprofit which monitors offshore manufacturing sites, to keep an eye on Foxconn and its other suppliers.
But none of this clears up The Browser's original question: Do Apple's iPod workers make enough money to afford even a measly iPod Shuffle?
Posted by Owen Thomas 10:29 AM 10 Comments | Add a Comment
Asking whether the workers "make enough money to afford even a measly iPod Shuffle" is the wrong question. The question should be, do they make enough money to make them want to work there? When it's their choice to work, who are you (or I) to say whether or not they're being paid enough?
no.... I don't really think that a guy in the ipod assembly line could even afford to purchase a meager ipod shuffle. They owe almost their soul to their employer... assuming they're chinese because some brokers put vietnamese or indonesian cheaper labour on those works... and they have to pay them a fee too for their travel expenses, housing, etc ... it's modern slavery, sadly that's the way it is... right?
They get paid to make the iPod not to buy one. The whole idea of minimum wage is a joke, a way for politicans to buy votes.
It is very doubtful that any mfg. worker can afford their own iPod Shuffle considering their super low wages...probably between US$100.00 - $150.00 per month.
That question is an unfair comparison. The real question is: where do the workers in the Foxconn facility stack up against other Chinese workers. It is an economic game. If the labor was not cheaper, in China, there would be no factory making iPods there. Complain as much as you want, but the major compaint of the workers there tell the entire story - not enough hours during off peak times... Sounds like they really hate it...
Browser, did the workers express their desire to own an iPod? I don't think so. Maybe they are not as concerned about trivial material things --- they are simple folks.
ipod shuffles are a luxury item with US prices!!
It's like asking if a worker on the Rolls Royce manufacturing line can afford a Rolls Royce. What a poor question.
China's workforce is not my concern, why isn't Apple building these devices in the US? I'd pay the extra premium to employ US workers. It is very disappointing to hear that Apple sends all this work to China - they are not the kind of US based company that I would support with future purchases.
I'm sure they can afford an iPod Shuffle if the workers really wanted it. But it will cost them about 50% of their salary. Assuming that they earn 1200-1400RMB/month.
Could any person working a min wage or below anywhere afford to own an ipod?
Are they making enough for a decent living in China?
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.