Our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy have changed.

By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to the new Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

To fix deficit, Congress needs the will to cut

By Robert L. Bixby, contributor

WASHINGTON (CNNMoney.com) -- With Congress having passed an expensive new health care plan, it is a good time to ask whether our political system is capable of undertaking major entitlement and tax reform to put the nation on a sustainable fiscal path.

It must do so -- sooner rather than later. However, it is far from clear whether that time has arrived. The work of President Obama's new fiscal commission this year will be a crucial test.

The commission's short-term mission is to shave about one percentage point of gross domestic product from the deficit in 2015 -- roughly $180 billion that year. As explained in the president's budget, the commission is also supposed to "examine policies to meaningfully improve the long-term fiscal outlook." This includes addressing "the growth of entitlement spending and the gap between the projected revenues and expenditures of the federal government."

If the commission is to make credible recommendations for these goals, it will have to include substantial spending cuts or tax increases -- without costly sweeteners to mitigate the pain. In other words, the commission will have to establish deficit reduction as the primary goal.

The political difficulty of this task has been illustrated by the health care reform debate. The plan that Obama signed into law contains some tough decisions. It could reduce net Medicare spending by hundreds of billions of dollars over 10 years and will raise substantial new revenue.

But because the plan also includes a big expansion of Medicaid and new health insurance subsidies for lower-income and even middle-income people, the overall deficit reduction would be small -- and that's if everything works according to plan.

So why didn't we begin with cost control measures and wait to expand health coverage until we knew the added costs would be affordable?

Top administration officials noted the "moral imperative" of health care reform, suggesting they had put a higher priority on extending coverage than on tackling cost control.

But they also said it was unlikely that Congress would approve extensive cost-containment measures in legislation dedicated entirely to deficit reduction.

Whatever its merits in the limited context of health care reform, this pragmatic argument has ominous implications for the broader work of the fiscal commission. If Congress is willing to enact major entitlement and tax reforms only while expanding other costs, the government will never achieve a sustainable fiscal path.

The time is fast approaching when sacrifice cannot be avoided. The natural desire for politicians to cut taxes and enact new spending programs has left us on a course that will run up the national debt to dangerous levels by the end of the decade. Interest costs would then exceed defense spending and consume more than one-third of all personal income tax dollars.

The president's commission will have to argue a case that many politicians don't want to hear. Reforms of the major entitlement programs -- Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid -- must be designed to curb spending growth, and tax reform must be designed to raise revenues. A simple "pay-as-you-go" approach will not be enough.

This does not mean that immediate spending cuts or tax increases should be implemented while the economy is still in a fragile state. Nor does it mean that we should take a meat cleaver to entitlement programs or raise tax rates across-the-board. However, the fiscal commission will have to set priorities and recommend trade-offs with the well-being of future generations in mind.

The commission will have to identify ways to better target benefits to where they are needed most, increase the efficiency of the tax system, and improve the value of health care spending in ways that go well beyond the measures in the new legislation.

These things will not happen with a status quo mentality. Nor will they happen unless the commission and the public recognize that deficit reduction has itself become a "moral imperative."

Robert L. Bixby is executive director of the Concord Coalition, a national, nonpartisan organization dedicated to fiscal responsibility. Bixby will be featured on "I.O.U.S.A.: Solutions," a CNN special about the national debt airing Saturday at 1 p.m. ET and Sunday at 3 p.m. ET.  To top of page

Index Last Change % Change
Dow 24,651.74 143.08 0.58%
Nasdaq 6,936.58 80.06 1.17%
S&P 500 2,675.81 23.80 0.90%
Treasuries 2.36 0.01 0.38%
Data as of 2:31am ET
Company Price Change % Change
Bank of America Corp... 29.04 0.31 1.08%
General Electric Co 17.82 0.18 1.02%
Oracle Corp 48.30 -1.89 -3.77%
Micron Technology In... 42.40 0.16 0.38%
Microsoft Corp 86.85 2.16 2.55%
Data as of Dec 15


More than 5% of DACA recipients have started their own businesses since enrolling the program, according to a recent survey. More

Republicans said their plan would make taxes easy to prepare, and indeed the final bill gets points for some simplification. But the whole story, like the tax code, is more complex. More

Uber is being sued by Waymo, Alphabet's self-driving car unit that was formerly part of Google. Waymo alleges that Uber stole trade secrets about its self-driving technology. More

Homeowners would be able to deduct interest on the first $750,000 of a new mortgage under the final tax bill -- down from the current $1 million threshold. More