Epic smackdown looms in Google vs. Oracle

schmidt_ellison.gi.top.jpgGoogle CEO Eric Schmidt (left) once headed Java development at Sun Microsystems, a company that Larry Ellison's Oracle bought in January. By David Goldman, staff writer


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Stuck between maintaining an unsettling status quo or causing a damaging but potentially lucrative ruckus, Oracle is going for the ruckus.

The enterprise software giant roiled Silicon Valley late Thursday evening by filing a lawsuit against Google over Java patent violations. Oracle (ORCL, Fortune 500) said Google's Android mobile operating system infringes on the intellectual property that Oracle acquired in its January purchase of Sun Microsystems. Google uses the Sun-developed Java software platform as part of its Android platform, which Oracle says violates seven of the patents it now owns.

Here's where it gets really confusing: Both Java and Android are open-source platforms. Neither Google nor Oracle make any money from their open-source software creations. Their source code is available for free, and any developer can essentially do they want with it.

That's exactly what Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) did. Rather than license the more sophisticated version of Java from Sun and Oracle that's designed for smartphones, Google essentially created a workaround using the free Java version. Google developed its own Java virtual machine -- software that runs Java-based applications -- for the Android operating system now used on millions of smartphones.

There is plenty of precedent for what Google did. In fact, the personal computer market exploded that way. In the '80s and '90s, a slew of "IBM compatible" PCs were developed by companies that reverse-engineered hardware to make computers that were able to run programs from IBM, and eventually Microsoft.

But that's not to say that Oracle's case is meritless. The company may be able to prove that Google violated its patents, despite Google's methods of circumventing Java's licenses: Oracle spokeswoman Karen Tillman claimed that Google's staff "knowingly, directly and repeatedly" violated the patents.

Google CEO Eric Schmidt is certainly someone who is familiar with those patents: Schmidt led Java's development when he was chief technology officer at Sun Microsystems in the 1980s and '90s.

In response to Oracle's lawsuit, Google said it will fight to defend open-source standards and continue to develop its Android platform as the lawsuit is ongoing.

"We are disappointed Oracle has chosen to attack both Google and the open-source Java community with this baseless lawsuit," Google spokesman Aaron Zamost said in an e-mailed statement. "The open-source Java community goes beyond any one corporation and works every day to make the Web a better place."

The fight is just the latest in a sea of ongoing, incredibly complex Silicon Valley intellectual property disputes. But with both companies producing open-source platforms, this is one is especially complicated.

"Java is used by everybody as a tool for development ... and this is a case of one big, hairy open-source platform tapping into another open-source platform," said Michael Grossi, director of tech industry consultancy Altman Vilandrie & Co. "If this case doesn't get settled, it's going to take a long time in the courts and will continue to go back and forth."

Even patent suits that are seemingly much simpler take years to get resolved. Unix maker SCO recently lost a seven-year patent battle against IBM (IBM, Fortune 500) and Novell (NOVL) over the way they used Unix in open-source Linux development.

The question for Oracle is, why sue Google? The answer likely lies in a little game theory -- something Oracle CEO Larry Ellison famously enjoys.

With Java, Oracle is faced with three unpleasant outcomes: It could do nothing and watch Google reap the rewards of developing the fastest-growing mobile platform for the blazing-hot smartphone market.

It could sue Google and lose. That would signal other developers that it's open season on circumventing Java's licenses.

Or it could sue Google and win. That would send a message that Java isn't as open as previously believed. Oracle didn't say what it is seeking in damages, but it would likely require Google to pay lucrative licensing fees on each Android phone and application sold.

"Oracle is damned if they do and damned if they don't, so it figured it might as well do and try to get paid," said Mark Driver, analyst at Gartner. "There's just tons and tons of potential money in this. But it's bad news for Java regardless of the outcome."

Android has been an almost instantaneous success, becoming the third highest-selling operating system in the world in less than three years, according to Gartner. Smartphones running Android outsold Apple's (AAPL, Fortune 500) iPhone in the second quarter, and were just barely edged out by Research In Motion's (RIMM) BlackBerry devices.  To top of page

Frontline troops push for solar energy
The U.S. Marines are testing renewable energy technologies like solar to reduce costs and casualties associated with fossil fuels. Play
25 Best Places to find rich singles
Looking for Mr. or Ms. Moneybags? Hunt down the perfect mate in these wealthy cities, which are brimming with unattached professionals. More
Fun festivals: Twins to mustard to pirates!
You'll see double in Twinsburg, Ohio, and Ketchup lovers should beware in Middleton, WI. Here's some of the best and strangest town festivals. Play
Index Last Change % Change
Dow 16,955.59 -128.21 -0.75%
Nasdaq 4,447.16 -24.95 -0.56%
S&P 500 1,978.71 -9.27 -0.47%
Treasuries 2.48 -0.03 -1.32%
Data as of 12:46pm ET
Company Price Change % Change
Facebook Inc 75.33 0.35 0.47%
Apple Inc 97.35 0.32 0.33%
General Motors Co 35.00 -0.74 -2.07%
Bank of America Corp... 15.57 -0.05 -0.32%
Ford Motor Co 17.65 -0.19 -1.07%
Data as of 12:31pm ET

Sections

Americans are wasting about $44 billion a year on name brands, when they could be buying the exact same products if they switched to cheaper store brands, says a new paper by economists from Tilburg University in the Netherlands and the University of Chicago. More

Americans are wasting about $44 billion a year on name brands, when they could be buying the exact same products if they switched to cheaper store brands, says a new paper by economists from Tilburg University in the Netherlands and the University of Chicago. More

Louisiana is now the top location for motion picture filming, supporting thousands of new jobs and small businesses. More

CNNMoney readers rip managers who micromanage to death, play favorites, throw their staff under the bus and steal credit for their work. More

Market indexes are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer Morningstar: © 2014 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer The Dow Jones IndexesSM are proprietary to and distributed by Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and have been licensed for use. All content of the Dow Jones IndexesSM © 2014 is proprietary to Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Chicago Mercantile Association. The market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2014. All rights reserved. Most stock quote data provided by BATS.