DENVER (CNNMoney.com) -- Financial markets are banking on another bond-buying spree by the Federal Reserve, but the central bank's policymakers aren't presenting a unified front on the controversial idea. The lack of a clear message could be one factor holding back the recovery, said several economists.
The Fed's policy making team is "dysfunctional," said Laurence Meyer, a former Fed governor, speaking Sunday in Denver at the conference for the National Association of Business Economics.
John Taylor, a Stanford University economist who spoke with Meyer, blamed the central bank for adding more uncertainty to the economy.
After the Fed's meeting in August, Meyer said, committee members emerged with different takes on the decision for a modest increase in U.S. Treasury purchases.
"You've got half of them saying they didn't do anything, and half coming out saying they did something fundamental," Meyer said. "You can disagree inside, but you should never step out of the room, and have a different view."
Even though only one member, Kansas City Fed president Thomas Hoenig, has formally voted against the committee's latest actions, several have recently come out either directly or subtly against making more Treasury purchases, a policy known as quantitative easing.
Since September 2008, the Fed has pumped some $2 trillion into the economy through asset purchases, meant to spur economic activity by lowering interest rates. It's not a risk-free strategy.
James Bullard, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, said on CNBC Friday that expanding the policy is a "tough call," and noted the Fed could risk reigniting inflation by overdoing it.
In recent public speeches, Charles Plosser of the Philadelphia Fed and Richard Fisher of the Dallas Fed have also clearly spoken out against the policy. Narayana Kocherlakota of the Minneapolis Fed has said another round of Treasury purchases would have a "muted impact" at best.
While those three don't currently have votes on Fed policy, they will next year, based on the committee voting rotation.
In the meantime, economists expect nearly all of the current voting members to side with Fed chairman Ben Bernanke at the next November meeting.
At its most recent meeting in September, the Fed used more aggressive language to signal further action, saying it was prepared to "provide additional accommodation."
The one member who will likely back up his dissenting voice with a formal vote, remains Hoenig, who has consistently voted against additional asset purchases and low interest rates.
"There are ways to respectfully dissent, and Tom embraces debate and does it in a formal way," said Diane Swonk, chief economist with Mesirow Financial.
But Swonk agreed with the idea that other means of dissent can be counterproductive, adding to the uncertainty in the economy that's holding both businesses and consumers back from spending.
"It's hard for financial market participants to see conflicting views," Swonk said. "It's like going to war and not having all your generals decided."
Despite the disagreements among Fed insiders, Wall Street seems to be counting on quantitative easing as a given outcome for the next Fed meeting in November.
On Friday, a worse-than-expected jobs report -- which would usually be seen as a bad sign -- sent the Dow above 11,000 because the downbeat news seemed to boost the chances of the Fed stepping in to save the day.
Volkswagen's headquarters was raided on Thursday by German police investigating the automaker's diesel emissions scandal. More
Cheap gas is saving Americans a lot of money in 2015. They say they've been saving it, but new evidence suggests otherwise. More
Facebook will begin testing a set of new emotions and reactions on its platform Friday for users in Ireland and Spain. More
Karim Abouelnaga turned down a job on Wall Street to address a problem that set him back as a low-income student: the summer slide. More
One of the largest pension funds in the country says it needs to cut benefits for 273,000 current and future retirees as soon as July. Otherwise, it won't be able to pay any benefits after 2025. More