Tax cut package: Is it worth the cost?

chart_bubbles6.top.gif By Jeanne Sahadi, senior writer


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The controversial tax cut compromise between President Obama and the Republicans was passed largely intact by both the House and the Senate, even though everybody dislikes at least some big piece of it.

Politically, of course, the compromise worked because everybody got at least something they wanted.

That's how the sausage got made. But in the end, will it prove to be good policy?

Will a package of widespread temporary tax cuts, extensions of unemployment benefits and new tax breaks be worth $858 billion of additional debt?

Stimulus vs. debt

The package could boost the economy in 2011 by an additional half- to full-percentage point above previous lackluster growth forecasts, according to a number of economic estimates.

"Job growth will be more than twice as strong, with payrolls growing by 2.6 million," Moody's Economy.com founder Mark Zandi wrote in an analysis last week. The bill will shave more than a point off the unemployment rate, pushing it "well below 9%" in 2011, according to Zandi.

"In all likelihood, the economy would have made it through next year without falling back into recession, but this compromise improves those odds significantly," he wrote.

While the United States cannot grow its way out of debt, even the staunchest deficit hawk says economic growth will be a key component in reducing debt.

So debt incurred to gin the economy -- if it succeeds in doing so -- may be money well borrowed.

But too much debt can hamper economic growth.

While the cost estimate of the compromise is $858 billion, the bill's critics worry that the long-term costs could grow much larger.

Their reasoning: Any effort to let the temporary tax cuts expire in the future will be vilified as "tax increases" in 2012, a presidential election year.

Furthermore, deficit hawks are very disappointed that the package wasn't paired with a plan for long-term fiscal restraint. Or even just a plan to pay for the package's provisions after the economy is on stronger footing.

They're not alone.

On Monday, the credit ratings agency Moody's said, "the negative effects on government finance are likely to outweigh the positive effects of higher economic growth. Unless there are offsetting measures, the package will be credit negative for the U.S. and increase the likelihood of a negative outlook on the U.S. government's Aaa rating during the next two years."

Kicking the can ... again

So if the new test for good policy is tough tradeoffs -- necessary measures to bolster the economy now in exchange for belt-tightening later -- the tax cut deal moving through Congress fails.

A new study from the Congressional Budget Office quantified the cost to the economy if lawmakers postpone implementing measures to curb debt from 2015 to 2025. During that time, debt will have climbed about 40 percentage points higher as a share of the economy.

Money available for private-sector investment would be reduced by up to 18% because more people would invest in government debt instead, the CBO estimates. That, in turn, would result in lower wages paid to workers and a reduced labor force.

As a result, the country's output would fall by as much as 7%, and consumption along with it by up to 5.5% relative to where they would be if Congress took action a decade earlier.

In addition, the government would have scarce few resources to address unexpected disasters or economic downturns, and far less money to fund many basic government programs.

Some signs suggest that lawmakers may not wait until 2025.

President Obama's debt commission put forth a serious plan to reduce federal debt over the next 10 years. And a large component of that plan was tax reform, an idea the president has promised to consider in earnest over the next two years.

If he does, and if Congress joins him in making a serious effort to do the same -- the outlook for 2025 could improve. To top of page

Frontline troops push for solar energy
The U.S. Marines are testing renewable energy technologies like solar to reduce costs and casualties associated with fossil fuels. Play
25 Best Places to find rich singles
Looking for Mr. or Ms. Moneybags? Hunt down the perfect mate in these wealthy cities, which are brimming with unattached professionals. More
Fun festivals: Twins to mustard to pirates!
You'll see double in Twinsburg, Ohio, and Ketchup lovers should beware in Middleton, WI. Here's some of the best and strangest town festivals. Play
Index Last Change % Change
Dow 17,810.06 91.06 0.51%
Nasdaq 4,712.97 11.10 0.24%
S&P 500 2,063.50 10.75 0.52%
Treasuries 2.32 -0.02 -0.86%
Data as of 12:01pm ET
Company Price Change % Change
Bank of America Corp... 17.12 0.12 0.71%
Kinder Morgan Inc 39.75 -0.17 -0.43%
Apple Inc 116.47 0.16 0.14%
Intel Corp 35.59 -0.36 -1.00%
Microsoft Corp 47.98 -0.72 -1.48%
Data as of Nov 21

Sections

This arrangement, announced Friday, illustrates how the lines have blurred between traditional TV networks and newfangled options like Netflix. More

The Obama administration is touting that its immigration action will boost wages. But the hike amounts to only $170 a year by 2024. More

Obama doesn't have the authority to create a startup visa, but part of his reform announcement could include a workaround for entrepreneurs: 'parole status.' More

Nearly half of all Americans say there's a chance they'll have to work during a holiday between Thanksgiving and New Year's, according to a new poll. And one in four say they'll have to work whether they want to or not. More

Most stock quote data provided by BATS. Market indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer.

Morningstar: © 2014 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Factset: FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2014. All rights reserved.

Chicago Mercantile Association: Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved.

Dow Jones: The Dow Jones branded indices are proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by DJI Opco, a subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and have been licensed for use to S&P Opco, LLC and CNN. Standard & Poor's and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. All content of the Dow Jones branded indices © S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2014 and/or its affiliates.