Our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy have changed.

By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to the new Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Mattel loses Bratz case

bratz.top.jpg By Charles Riley, staff reporter


NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- A federal jury ruled against Mattel Thursday, awarding damages to MGA Entertainment in the latest twist in a dispute over the ownership of Bratz, the most popular dolls since Barbie.

The jurors in a Santa Ana, Calif. court found Mattel does not own rights to the popular Bratz franchise, and that rival MGA did not steal the idea.

The two toymakers have been engaged in a running battle over who owns the lucrative doll line for the better part of a decade. Mattel argued that since the idea was developed by designer Carter Bryant while he was a Mattel employee, it owns the rights.

MGA argued that the language of Bryant's contract only covered work created within the scope of the job, and not work done during his own time or outside of his duties at the company.

Both sides have scored big wins in the past, but on Thursday MGA prevailed.

The jury found that Mattel's (MAT, Fortune 500) copyright claim on the franchise was invalid, and that MGA had not stolen trade secrets from Mattel.

Instead, the jurors awarded MGA $88.5 million in damages, finding that Mattel was the party that had stolen trade secrets. MGA had accused Mattel of stealing 114 of them. The jury awarded damages in 26 instances.

"We are grateful for a hard-working and smart jury," MGA CEO Isaac Larian said in an email to CNNMoney.

"This is a victory for all the hard-working entrepreneurs and small companies who get bullied unfairly by large multinational corporations with deep pockets," he said.

Mattel said it would challenge the decision.

"MGA's claims against us were simply not supported by the evidence at trial. We will ask the court to set aside the verdict. Once the judge rules on our motions, we will evaluate our next steps," Mattel general counsel Robert Normile said in a statement.

The jury did find MGA at fault on one count, saying the company did in fact intentionally interfere with Bryan's contract with Mattel.

Last year, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco dismissed a December 2008 ruling that gave Mattel ownership rights. To top of page

Index Last Change % Change
Dow 16,102.38 -272.38 -1.66%
Nasdaq 4,683.92 -49.58 -1.05%
S&P 500 1,921.22 -29.91 -1.53%
Treasuries 2.13 -0.04 -1.85%
Data as of 10:51am ET
Company Price Change % Change
Bank of America Corp... 15.65 -0.29 -1.82%
Apple Inc 109.27 -1.10 -1.00%
Alcoa Inc 9.49 -0.08 -0.84%
Microsoft Corp 42.61 -0.89 -2.05%
General Electric Co 24.00 -0.51 -2.08%
Data as of Sep 4
Sponsors

Sections

Jessica Alba's Honest Company has been sued by a customer who claims the company is making false claims in its marketing and labeling. More

The Obama economy was supposed to be a selling point for Democrats. But China is rising fears of a global slowdown. More

Google has released Chrome 45, which claims to make your browser faster and give your laptop battery extra life. More

Harlem's Hot Bread Kitchen teaches kitchen skills to low-income immigrant so they can find employment. More

Pimco's famous fund once managed by star manager Bill Gross has less than $100 billion in management for the first time since 2007. More