Obama tax plan: Democrats push back

Funding health reform by clipping deductions for top 1.2% of taxpayers isn't sitting well with lawmakers. A chief tax writer suggests a different approach.

EMAIL  |   PRINT  |   SHARE  |   RSS
google my aol my msn my yahoo! netvibes
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all CNNMoney.com RSS FEEDS (close)
By Jeanne Sahadi, CNNMoney.com senior writer

Is President Obama right to say stocks may be a good long-term investment?
  • Yes, prices are low enough to buy
  • No, the market will be down for a long time

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- One of the most controversial provisions in President Obama's proposed budget might have a short shelf life on Capitol Hill.

To pay for half of his $634 billion health reform fund, Obama has proposed limiting deductions for high-income taxpayers starting in 2011.

Instead of using their top income tax rate to calculate the value of a deduction, single filers making more than $200,000 and joint filers making more than $250,000 wouldn't be allowed to reduce their bill by any more than 28% of a given deduction. That's below what the top two tax rates would be in 2011.

That means the value of some of the most popular deductions -- such as mortgage interest and charitable contributions -- would be reduced for high-income filers.

But the provision, which is likely to be debated at a health care summit the president has set for Thursday, has already met resistance from some leading Senate Democrats including Finance Chairman Max Baucus and committee member Ron Wyden, D-Ore.

At a hearing Wednesday, Baucus told Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner that he questioned the "viability" of the itemized deduction proposal and suggested the administration find another way to help pay for its health reform fund.

"There are other tax provisions that have a lot to do with health care, but that one does not. I'd just urge the administration to dig down deeper to try to find viable savings and concentrate on savings within health care reform," Baucus said.

One main criticism of Obama's proposal is that it would harm charitable giving.

In response, Geithner said the provision would only affect 1.2% of taxpayers and have only "modest effects" on how much people donate.

"The most important thing you can do for overall charitable giving is to get the economy strong," Geithner said.

One expert agrees that giving is closely tied to the fate of the economy.

"If GDP is down, there's going to be a decline in giving," said Daniel Borochoff, president of the American Institute of Philanthropy.

Len Burman, director of the Tax Policy Center, estimates that the provision would reduce annual giving by roughly 2%, or $9 billion, in 2011.

Congressional push-back on the plan to curb deductions could force the administration to find another way to generate the billions it needs to fund its signature health care plan.

Senator offers another approach

Baucus pointed to one possible alternative. He asked Geithner whether the administration would consider generating new revenue by curbing or eliminating the tax break offered to employees when they buy health insurance policies through their companies.

Currently, the portion of their premiums paid by the employer is treated as tax free income to employees, meaning they pay no income tax on that subsidy, nor do they pay Social Security or Medicare tax on it.

The health insurance exclusion is the federal government's single biggest tax expenditure, worth $246 billion in forgone revenue in 2007, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

Calls to change the tax exclusion have been made before both because the subsidy does not discourage workers from being more cost-conscious in their health care decisions and because it favors only those who get insurance through an employer, not those who buy policies on their own.

During last year's campaign, Obama said that while he wanted to reform health care, he would not seek to overturn the tax-free subsidy for those who get their insurance from their jobs.

Without committing to Baucus' suggestion in particular, Geithner seemed to indicate that the administration might be willing to reconsider its deduction proposal.

"We recognize there [are] more paths to [paying for health reform] than what we laid out in the budget," he told the Finance Committee. "But we wanted to put it on the table to prove the credibility of our commitment to do this, concrete proposals that would achieve that."  To top of page

They're hiring!These Fortune 100 employers have at least 350 openings each. What are they looking for in a new hire? More
If the Fortune 500 were a country...It would be the world's second-biggest economy. See how big companies' sales stack up against GDP over the past decade. More
Sponsored By:
More Galleries
10 of the most luxurious airline amenity kits When it comes to in-flight pampering, the amenity kits offered by these 10 airlines are the ultimate in luxury More
7 startups that want to improve your mental health From a text therapy platform to apps that push you reminders to breathe, these self-care startups offer help on a daily basis or in times of need. More
5 radical technologies that will change how you get to work From Uber's flying cars to the Hyperloop, these are some of the neatest transportation concepts in the works today. More

Most stock quote data provided by BATS. Market indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer. Morningstar: © 2018 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Factset: FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2018. All rights reserved. Chicago Mercantile Association: Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. Dow Jones: The Dow Jones branded indices are proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by DJI Opco, a subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and have been licensed for use to S&P Opco, LLC and CNN. Standard & Poor's and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. All content of the Dow Jones branded indices © S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2018 and/or its affiliates.