NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Hell may hath no fury like shareholders of Goldman Sachs scorned.
Goldman investors are converging on lower Manhattan for the firm's annual shareholder meeting. Typically a rather mild-mannered affair, the gathering is poised to turn contentious given the scrutiny Goldman has been under in recent weeks.
"There are going to be some angry shareholders, no doubt," said Les Satlow, a portfolio manager at the Massachusetts-based Cabot Money Management, whose firm owns shares of Goldman Sachs. "Some of them will want blood from management."
More than that, shareholders will be looking for answers about the various legal woes the company is now facing.
Last month, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged the company and one of its employees with defrauding investors in the sale of securities tied to subprime mortgages. Goldman has repeatedly denied the charges, adding it plans to defend itself in court.
Since then the company has reportedly become the subject of a federal criminal investigation. There has also been a plethora of civil suits filed against Goldman.
Experts think Goldman's top executives will acknowledge the firm's troubles, but don't anticipate any major revelatory statements since the company is facing ongoing litigation.
"I'd be surprised if they have very much to say," said Adam Kanzer, managing director and general counsel of Domini Social Investment, a mutual fund firm that is sponsoring a shareholder ballot measure that would require the company to be more transparent about its political contributions.
This year, a total of eight proposals will be up for a vote, including one that would require the company to split the role of chairman and CEO, both of which are currently held by Lloyd Blankfein
Blankfein has become the public face of the embattled firm and the target of much criticism.
Last week, he endured a brutal line of questioning from Senate lawmakers about Goldman's dealings leading up to the crisis, including allegations the company bet aggressively against the U.S. housing market and made as much as $3.7 billion in the process.
While public outrage at Goldman and Wall Street is close to its highest point since the crisis erupted, it remains unclear whether a significant number of shareholders will vote to strip Blankfein of his chairmanship. But it may not take a majority vote to convince the company's board to make changes
Laura Berry, executive director of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, which represents 300 faith-based institutional investors, including several groups sponsoring shareholder proposals at Friday's meeting, said that if Blankfein were to receive at least a 30% vote in favor of splitting the chairman and CEO role, that could spell trouble for the Goldman chief.
"My sense is that when you start to see a third of shareholders saying we think changes need to be made, I think you have to really look at your governance structure," she said.
Shareholders will also be granted an advisory vote on the fiscal year 2009 compensation of Goldman's top five executive officers, a so-called "say on pay."
Late last year, the company announced its 30-member management committee had declined to accept any cash bonuses for the year, amid public outrage over Wall Street bonuses.
Blankfein earned a salary of $600,000 and 58,381 shares of company restricted stock, which was worth about $9 million at the time.
Such concessions might have soothed shareholder activists were it not for the precipitous drop in Goldman's stock in recent weeks.
Since the SEC first brought civil fraud charges against the company, investors have collectively lost more than $19 billion, erasing a substantial amount of gains it had achieved late last year as the financial sector roared back.
With Goldman's legal woes mounting by the day, analysts have been reluctant to recommend the stock. Some have even cut their rating.
One easy defense for Goldman in all this is the company's performance. Last quarter, it earned $3.4 billion, easily shattering Wall Street estimates.
But with the firm under such scrutiny, now might be the time for Goldman executives to just sit back and take its lumps from irritated investors.
Congress waited until the last minute to decide what to do with a slew of expired tax breaks. They extended most of them, and a handful will affect individuals directly. More