CNNMoney.com
Companies Economy International Corrections Pre-market Trading After-hours Trading Winners/Losers/Actives Bonds Currencies Commodities World Markets Money Magazine Real Estate Taxes Jobs Ask the Expert Money 101 Autos Mutual Funds The Help Desk Loan Center Best Places to Live Ask the Expert Ultimate Guide to Retirement Retirement Calculators Best Funds Best Places to Retire Fortune Brainstorm Tech Apple 2.0 Blog Big Tech Blog Sectors and Stocks Tech Talk Resource Guide Small Business Makeovers Questions & Answers Small Business Video 100 Best Places to Launch FSB 100 Fortune Small Business Fortune 500 Brainstorm Tech Investing Management C-Suite Rankings Main Create Portfolio Edit Portfolio Create Alerts Edit Alerts
2 of 11
BACKNEXT
Help the middle class
Help the middle class
Fetterman with wife, Erin; and three children, Maggie, Kate, and Henry
Patrick Fetterman, 44, software marketing executive, Rochester Hills, Mich.

I'm a married father of three young children, and I work at a software company based in Michigan. My salary has been rising through the years as I have been promoted, and I am now making about 7 times what I made when I first graduated from college (which wasn't much). However, my compensation is still well below the $250K cutoff that Obama has talked about for raising tax rates. Despite this, the tax calculators I've seen show that my taxes may go up slightly under Obama, by a few hundred dollars per year.

My financial justification for voting for Obama is not straightforward. I'm not such an altruist that I'm happy about paying higher taxes. Rather, I think that the focus on a prosperous middle class will be the best thing for the country. More importantly, I think a prosperous middle class will boost the success of my company, and cause my retirement savings and other investments to rise more than they have in the last eight years under a Republican administration (even discounting this horrid year for stocks). In other words, my choices were:

1) Lower taxes (good) but also lower overall prosperity, with a negative effect on my company's performance and my investments' performance.

2) Slightly higher taxes (bad) but overall higher prosperity, with a positive effect on my company's and investments' performance.

This is the opposite of the 'trickle-down policy' of the University of Chicago/Republican supply-siders, which I think has been discredited once and for all. In fact, you might think of this as a 'rising tide floats all boats' policy. So I still 'voted my pocketbook,' though it took me a while to think this through.



NEXT: Rein in predatory lenders

Last updated November 12 2008: 4:10 PM ET
Obama on 20 key issues What will the new President mean for your wallet? See where President-elect Barack Obama stands on major economic issues. More
Obama's business brain trust On the long road to the White House, Barack Obama reached out to a diverse collection of economic thinkers. More
How the economy stole the election Two years ago it seemed that the election would hinge on Iraq, but the economy became tops on voters' minds. Here's how that happened. More
Special Offer
© 2009 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 BigCharts.com Inc. All rights reserved. Please see our Terms of Use.
MarketWatch, the MarketWatch logo, and BigCharts are registered trademarks of MarketWatch, Inc.
Intraday data provided by Interactive Data Real-Time Services and subject to the Terms of Use.
Intraday data is at least 20-minutes delayed. All times are ET.
Historical, current end-of-day data, and splits data provided by Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data.
Fundamental data provided by Morningstar, Inc..
SEC Filings data provided by Edgar Online Inc..
Earnings data provided by FactSet CallStreet, LLC.