'Toxic asset' plan's winners and losers

Chase and Wells Fargo may look to sell soured assets from recent acquisitions; banks who were more aggressive valuing their loans may balk at program.

EMAIL  |   PRINT  |   SHARE  |   RSS
 
google my aol my msn my yahoo! netvibes
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all CNNMoney.com RSS FEEDS (close)
By David Ellis, CNNMoney.com staff writer

chart_bad_assets.gif

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- If the government is hoping for a coordinated response from the banking sector with its latest toxic asset plan, it better not hold its breath.

A little more than a week after the ambitious program was launched, there are already signs that the industry is struggling to reach a consensus opinion on the issue.

Some institutions have publicly endorsed the so-called "Public-Private Investment Program," including Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500). In a statement, the San Francisco-based bank said it supported any plan by the Treasury Department that helps financial institutions sell troubled assets.

And following last week's meeting between financial industry leaders and President Obama at the White House, Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) CEO Vikram Pandit called it "constructive."

Experts point out that JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) and Wells Fargo could both be big winners from the program since they may use it to ditch some of the problematic loans they inherited through their acquisitions of Washington Mutual and Wachovia respectively.

Such a move would help the pair book gains on these assets, Barclays Capital analyst Jason Goldberg wrote in a note to clients last week.

Chase did not respond to calls for comment. A Wells Fargo spokesperson said it was premature to comment on their own plans to participate in the Treasury program.

Pricing still a big issue

Still, other banks have grumbled privately about the program, particularly the thorny issue of pricing, which stalled the launch of the plan earlier this year.

All participating banks risk additional writedowns by selling chunks of their loan portfolio or existing investment securities on their books.

But banks that have already drastically written down the value of some of these assets may be particularly reluctant to sell now since there are signs the housing market and the broader economy will eventually find its footing.

"I don't see at this point that these banks have a strong motive to sell unless they think the price is right," said Gary Gorton, professor of finance at Yale School of Management.

Complicating things further is Thursday's move by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to relax the rules as to how banks value some of their assets.

That might lead bankers to think that their troubled assets may now be worth a whole lot more than they were just a few weeks ago since they are no longer required to value them at distressed prices.

Nonetheless, experts seem to agree that some banks will probably be willing to quickly sell their most complex securities -- including residential and commercial-mortgage-backed securities -- even though they may be reluctant to part with some of their loans.

But industry regulators, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., have indicated that they may push banks to sell more assets on their books to help generate much-needed capital.

That decision may very likely be tied to the results of the so-called "stress test" that the Treasury Department is currently conducting on the nation's 19 largest banks, said Jess Varughese, managing partner at the New York City-based consultancy Milestone, which recently rolled out a program aimed at assisting banks shed such troubled assets.

Banks that ace their regulatory test, which may very likely include the Wall Street giants Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500) and Morgan Stanley (MS, Fortune 500), may not have a big impetus to sell, he said, knowing they have the government's seal of approval. Those that don't do well on the stress test may not have a choice.

"My suspicion is for a bank on the edge of the stress test there is going to be pressure to clean up their balance sheet," he said. To top of page

Features
They're hiring!These Fortune 100 employers have at least 350 openings each. What are they looking for in a new hire? More
If the Fortune 500 were a country...It would be the world's second-biggest economy. See how big companies' sales stack up against GDP over the past decade. More
Sponsored By:
More Galleries
10 of the most luxurious airline amenity kits When it comes to in-flight pampering, the amenity kits offered by these 10 airlines are the ultimate in luxury More
7 startups that want to improve your mental health From a text therapy platform to apps that push you reminders to breathe, these self-care startups offer help on a daily basis or in times of need. More
5 radical technologies that will change how you get to work From Uber's flying cars to the Hyperloop, these are some of the neatest transportation concepts in the works today. More
Sponsors
Worry about the hackers you don't know 
Crime syndicates and government organizations pose a much greater cyber threat than renegade hacker groups like Anonymous. Play
GE CEO: Bringing jobs back to the U.S. 
Jeff Immelt says the U.S. is a cost competitive market for advanced manufacturing and that GE is bringing jobs back from Mexico. Play
Hamster wheel and wedgie-powered transit 
Red Bull Creation challenges hackers and engineers to invent new modes of transportation. Play

Most stock quote data provided by BATS. Market indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. All times are ET. Disclaimer. Morningstar: © 2018 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Factset: FactSet Research Systems Inc. 2018. All rights reserved. Chicago Mercantile Association: Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved. Dow Jones: The Dow Jones branded indices are proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by DJI Opco, a subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and have been licensed for use to S&P Opco, LLC and CNN. Standard & Poor's and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. All content of the Dow Jones branded indices © S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2018 and/or its affiliates.