CNNMoney.com
Companies Economy International Corrections Pre-market Trading After-hours Trading Winners/Losers/Actives Bonds Currencies Commodities World Markets Money Magazine Real Estate Taxes Jobs Ask the Expert Money 101 Autos Mutual Funds The Help Desk Loan Center Best Places to Live Ask the Expert Ultimate Guide to Retirement Retirement Calculators Best Funds Ask the Mole Best Places to Retire Big Tech Blog Techland Blog Sectors and Stocks Fortune 500 Techs Tech Talk 100 Best Places to Launch Ultimate Resource Guide Small Biz Makeovers FSB 100 Ask & Answer Fortune 500 Technology Investing Management C-Suite Rankings Main Create Portfolio Edit Portfolio Create Alerts Edit Alerts
 
Comcast outage blocks Google, YouTube
A hardware problem in Comcast's Boston-area Internet network got dozens of local cable-modem surfers steamed, according to Bostonist. Google and YouTube were among the sites temporarily blocked. The outage was no big deal, but what provoked major howls was Comcast's do-nothing, blame-everyone customer support. Phone reps blamed users' Firefox Web browsers, telling them to switch to Internet Explorer, or said Google was at fault for the problem. Others told Gmail users to use Comcast email instead. Another rep told Bostonist that Comcast wouldn't do anything to fix the problem until a "critical number of calls" came through. Comcast did finally fess up that it was at fault, blaming a server for the incident.

But that raises a good question: If this kind of blockage can happen by accident, imagine what Comcast could do intentionally to block other websites. There's been a lot of debate about "net neutrality" - the idea that Internet service providers shouldn't favor one set of websites over another, and this outage highlights the problem. And it also raises the possibility of a more passive-aggressive kind of discrimination: By steering customers to its own websites and placing the blame on others instead of addressing its own network-connection problems, is Comcast unfairly undermining its Internet rivals?
Posted by Owen Thomas 11:37 AM 4 Comments comment | Add a Comment

Comcast already *does* impinge on net neutrality by arbitrailiy blocking email from ISPs that it deems, using its own private set of criteria, "send too much spam". In many cases, the only crime that an ISP has committed to be blocked is that they allow their users to forward email to a comcast.net address, and sometimes, that includes forwarding spam that made it through that ISP's spam filters.

Look at http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/08/30/comcast-forwards-to-be-disabled-and-aol-update/
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16748959

The fact that, as your article points out, their customer service seems to be willing to blame anyone except themselves have left a lot of small ISPs and mail services out in the cold. They don't have the resources to fight the 800lb. gorilla.
Posted By James H, Annapolis, MD : 3:54 PM  

Thanks for this article. I am a Comcast customer in Boston and I couldn't understand why I couldn't get GMAIL or Google on my home computer but I could get it on my VPN'd work computer. Since it's a local Comcast problem it makes sense but boy was I confused yesterday!!
Posted By Derek, Lowell, ma : 6:32 PM  

Comcast just took over control of my cable service, Time Warner Cable, and in less than a week, they've already screwed things up and shown me that they're not going to be very cooperative.

And I've already seen the same problems mentioned in a previous posting about the blocking smaller ISP's mail services...that was a real stinker!
Posted By Tim, Memphis, TN : 3:47 AM  

I ordered Comcast Internet service about a month ago. It has worked intermittently for about a week. Comcast admits the problem is with their system, yet refuses to credit my account for service I have not received. Comcast Corporation's annual revenues are $22,255,000,000. If customers do not receive service 1% of the time because their system is down and Comcast refuses to credit the account for the unused portion, Comcast gains $222,550,000 for services they did not provide. I'm surprised an attorney has not looked into this (hint).
Posted By Jeff, Memphis, TN : 8:56 AM  

To send a letter to the editor about The Browser, click hereTop of page

Got a news tip? Send it to The Browser


© 2009 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 BigCharts.com Inc. All rights reserved. Please see our Terms of Use.
MarketWatch, the MarketWatch logo, and BigCharts are registered trademarks of MarketWatch, Inc.
Intraday data provided by Interactive Data Real-Time Services and subject to the Terms of Use.
Intraday data is at least 20-minutes delayed. All times are ET.
Historical, current end-of-day data, and splits data provided by Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data.
Fundamental data provided by Morningstar, Inc..
SEC Filings data provided by Edgar Online Inc..
Earnings data provided by FactSet CallStreet, LLC.