Our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy have changed.

By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to the new Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Money and Main Street
9 of 12
BACKNEXT
Why wasn't TARP enough?
Question: "Shouldn't TARP have been enough for the banks to at least recoup a majority of their losses and stabilize their balance sheets?" -- Matt Sedlak, Littlestown, Penn.

Expert: Michele Boldrin, professor of economics, University of Washington in St. Louis

Answer: "There are two answers, the quick, nasty one and the longer more detailed one.

The quick, nasty one is that the losses were bigger than the money we put in. The longer answer is that not all of the money was used to cover the losses; some of it was used to pay for bonuses and things like that.

But the truth is that if we put in $500 billion, we'd still be about a trillion short. The TARP approach is to basically avoid any kind of major bank failure. But some losses are real and we just have to accept that we had invested money into things for years that we assumed were worth X. But it turns out they were worth quite a bit less - and that 'quite a bit' is gone.

For example, when bad investments are made, you have to make future readjustments. Like with mortgage lending. There was a substantial amount lent out to build homes and remodel them: $11.7 trillion, to be exact. The banks put that on the balance sheet as profit for when it is paid back. But now people are not able to pay it back, so what looked like profit isn't. So in order to balance out that loss, you would have to put money in to cover it, but there isn't enough money being put in to cover the losses.

The current idea is that we take money from those that didn't assume and give it to those who did so that they hurt a little less and we all stay afloat."

NEXT: What happens if the stimulus fails?

Last updated April 14 2009: 11:56 AM ET
More Galleries
Google's logos through the years Google changed its logo for the fifth time in 17 years this week. Here's what the old ones looked like. More
How much you should have saved for retirement right now Joe is 50 years old and makes $70,000 a year. He should already have $364,000 saved for retirement. Are you on track? More
The stock market's wild week in 6 pictures It was the wildest week in stocks in recent memory. Here's photos and CNNMoney's tweets of reactions to the panicked selling on Monday and Tuesday, which gave way to a mad buying scramble on Wednesday and Thursday. And then...a selloff on Friday again. More

Special Offer